Skip Navigation
105 comments
  • CS was already oversaturated 10 years ago. There was just lots of cheap money to fund start ups and new business

    • Yeah that was when I was first job hunting and struggling with it, and I remember people saying “a degree isn’t enough, what you really need these days is a portfolio.” I cobbled one together with school projects and some basic ass robot I made in my free time, and eventually I got in. But now I wonder if a zoomer who just graduated could pull off the same thing.

  • I genuinely truly hate that there is both a huge population of older/retiring senior programmers in all sorts of jobs (MEGACORPS, state, local, public, federal, and small-businesses alike) and also a huge population of eager/teachable junior programmers looking for jobs. If our stupid social organization wasn't so motivated by markets and profit we'd all be better off for it.

    Older professionals linking up with younger professionals to cultivate talent, share ideas, and generally make better code would be great but the Vampires and Mummies don't want better products or better workers, they want profits and whatever the current magical hyped super-tech is. I'd also think a lot of our terrible brittle software infrastructure wouldn't suck so much either if new hires and seasoned professionals worked together more often.

    Regardless, comp-sci majors aren't all would-be techno tyrants and wannabe Silicon Valley venture capitalists. Most of them are just regular people who did what they were "supposed" to do, and went to school to get a degree in field they were told will have have jobs for them. Sure like ~10-20% of them wanna be the next Zuckerberg or whatever, but that's true of any graduating class of STEM dorks.

    It's all really fucked up. I feel bad for them because even if you push all of the many legitimate problems of higher education aside, that shit is too expensive to have a job lined up after graduation. 6-18 months of under/unemployment is not good for the souls of young people who have been told their whole life that you have to have a grown-up job or you're a bum.

  • 8 years ago at 32 yo I found myself with a film studies degree and not job and decided to coming back to college. I planned to enroll on computer sciences, but days before the inscription I changed it to actuarial sciences mainly because the admission would be easier (like 100 vs 5 students per admission) and I wanted to be sure I was admitted. Best decision ever. Nowadays I have a solid stable job with full benefits, and at the end I'm a programmer (python/pandas now learning polars) but with actuarial/accounting/finance knowledge that gives me an edge over other programmers or actuaries.

    • I planned to enroll on computer sciences, but days before the inscription I changed it to actuarial sciences mainly because the admission would be easier

      It's the complete opposite in my country. Actuarial science requires you to basically have a perfect GPA (at least our country's version of GPA), while computer science "only" requires a good GPA.

      • In my college is an admission test, best 40 get the spot. High school graduates know and arw interested om computer sciences, actuarial sciences have no glamor, nobody knows about and it's have the reputation of being extremely hard, so almost nobody even gives it a try.

  • Not even a programmer, just a software implementation person, and it took me almost 2 years to land a job after losing my last tech gig.

    It really pains me that so many others are having as much or more trouble than I had. Now im not even in the tech field (but still doing like data analysis shit)

  • See, they should’ve just gone into the trades.

    Also, if you’re in a trade and can’t find a job, that’s your fault for not getting a bachelor’s.

  • Backfires?

    That was the point.

    They wanted to increase the reserve supply of coders and so they saturated the labor pool with tons and tons of graduates, who now have to compete with each other for a dwindling supply of jobs. "Learn to code" was always about lowering wages and employment.

105 comments