Amazon's humanoid warehouse robots will eventually cost only $3 per hour to operate. That won't calm workers' fears of being replaced. - Digit is a humanoid bipedal robot from Agility Robotics.

I often hear people say there is no need to worry about robots taking jobs, as automation has always done that, but new jobs have been created. The problem with that line of thought is - what happens when AI & Robots can do all the new jobs too? They'll be much cheaper. What business is going to survive paying human wages (+health +social security contributions, etc) - when another business can do the same with robots/AI for pennies?

At that point we'll finally have to give up on capitalism, we'll employ a UBI for everyone and live like a retired Picard.
- How did the Picard family have an enormous house, and hundreds of acres of land in a socialist society?
At that point the working class gets so hungry that we wage a total war for our survival against the wealthy. Or we get propaganda and bread and circuses sufficient to keep us barely away from it
- we wage a total war for our survival against the wealthy
  That seems very dramatic. I wonder if the Covid pandemic is a more realistic example of how things will play out. It's amazing how in the space of only several weeks in March-April 2020 the whole planet changed so dramatically, and yet in such a calm, orderly fashion.
- Or we get propaganda and bread and circuses sufficient to keep us barely away from it
  "Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will. Find out just what any people will quietly submit to and you have found out the exact measure of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them, and these will continue till they are resisted with either words or blows, or with both. The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress."
  --Frederick Douglas
I think a common misconception is that people will find new jobs. If I'm remembering correctly, studies on automation of furniture production found that displaced workers mostly just fell into poverty.
Certainly SOME people will find better jobs, but if it were simple and easy for people to find "high skill jobs" instead of thier warehouse work, they would have already done it.
- And yet, nobody complains about the mechanical loom anymore.
  If you've invested a lot training to be a master weaver, yeah, there's no getting those years back when you're replaced. That the number of jobs stays the same is completely and verifiably true, but there's definitely losers every step of the way, who basically just get knocked down to unskilled labour, or who have to relocate altogether (but usually more winners).
I think that absolutely is the point of transition. Making a few jobs obsolete is progress, making them all obsolete is new and uncharted territory.
Then new jobs will open.

Honestly we can't fight the inevitable. The solution for those workers is getting a education and specializing. Its doesn't mean a university either it can be a trade school or even an apprenticeship

There's only so many tradesmen that are needed though. You get 20% of the unskilled labour market to specialize and all of a sudden every trades sector is over saturated.
- Which means all the salaries go down, and the rich just keep getting richer.
- Then people will find new things to do. The extra man hours can be dedicated towards the manufacture of luxury products, art, and other less utilitarian items.
  I do worry about the transition period, however. Mass unemployment isn't a permanent problem, but in the short term it can be a very severe problem.
  In the words of my old economics teacher, subsidizing a steel plant just because you don't want to fire people may be inefficient, but do you really want to go walk in and tell a bunch of big steel workers their work is no longer worth it?
- I don't believe that's how it works. Right now there is a ton of demand for skilled labor and I don't foresee that changing

I mean replacing jobs that are basically just being a humanoid robot is actually not a bad thing...

It wouldn't be if the generation of jobs that aren't just being a humanoid robot was 1:1 with their replacement. Instead, we're just treading the edge of forcing people out of the workforce with nothing for them to go to that's in the forced-out's skillset. Where's the training-up, as opposed to the forcing-out?
Further, are we really just gonna take Amazon at their word regarding "oh, they're meant to work collaboratively with a human workforce, not replace them!" Cause I sure as shit don't.
- You simply don't need so many people when you replace humanoid robots with actual robots...
I get what you mean, but what are millions of people going to do for work instead?
- There are enough other places that need workers...

Digit costs about $10 to $12 an hour to operate right now, based on its price and lifespan, but the company predicts that cost to drop to $2 to $3 an hour plus overhead software costs as production ramps up, Agility Robotics CEO Damion Shelton told Bloomberg.

So the guy selling robots makes that unsubstantiated claim and works in a qualifier about software fees because even using fake numbers they know they'll never actually be that low.

Also, nothing stops encouraging the robots to join a union using the methods Teamsters usually employ.

What's their productivity compared to a person? And uptime with maintenance or troubleshooting? I don't doubt that eventually they'll be better, but I don't know if that time will be any time soon.

This is actually quite terrifying. This is going to affect millions, possibly billions of people.

I'm almost certain these robots suck, don't panic. We can barely make a car with no limbs to manage, on a marked road, behave reasonably.

I don't think so that this robots replace Humans in the near time. Every single Human growed up with a braine optimized for spatial body movement in Millions of Years. Consider this! If you see videos how this Humanoid robots move, you see that we are still long away from a time with human-like robots.