No, it's about making a quick buck with the first couple months of subscription before Apple kills the workaround again. That's it.
Companies know making a statement or somehow making their product sound like some fight for user freedom will make crap tier articles like these circle around, making more people know the product and therefore raising the chance of some sucker buying a subscription.
If this were a fight against locked down Apple protocols, they'd be Saurik - a dude who dedicated over a decade of his life doing this, a lot of personal money, a lot of time in courtrooms and similar, and never tried to sell you anything or get famous over it. He did more than people like Rossmann, but with a thousand times less public support and fame.
A product became temporarily free after a major roadblocker that brought on negative press? Oh my god! That's crazy, I've never seen this before! You've totally convinced me, they're doing this out of passion.
@Dave I stopped reading the moment I saw that his thesis is based on the wrong fact that Beeper Mini relays messages through their servers. It doesn't, it connects directly w/ Apple, and the code is OSS & verifiable.