You're viewing a single thread.
95
comments
Honestly not the worst thing I’ve seen.
I'd like you to think for a moment about CTEs, the HAVING clause, window functions and every other funky and useful thing you can do in SQL ... Now just think, do you think that this syntax supports all those correctly?
sql syntax doesn't support even itself correctly i fail to see your point
Probably no better or worse than any other ORM written in a more traditional language. Worst comes to worst, you can always escape to plain SQL.
You'd certainly have to have a CTE to even entertain the thought of using this syntax in the real world.
You've viewed 95 comments.