Federal judge rules ban on firearms in post offices unconstitutional

Now do courthouses and see how well that goes.

You know what else is public? Courthouses.

Florida is such a shit hole.

in Florida

surprise! ;)

Edit: Ha ha, downvoted...Florida Man is watching!

We should make sure it's also unconstitutional to block guns at:

• Courthouses
• GOP conventions
• Political rallies
• NRA conventions

I wonder how the court would respond to a petition to allow firearms in court rooms. It's a god-given American freedom, guaranteed by the second amendment right?

Cool, so the place that mass shootings in the US began, and coined its own phrase, now must allow armed nut jobs inside. What could go wrong!?

Going postal now legal in Florida.

This is a ridiculous ruling, but the reason the ban on guns in post offices makes many gun owners so angry is that unlike pretty much any other no-gun zone laws, it includes all of the property, including the parking lot.

So if a licensed person removes their gun and leaves it in the car so they can go into the post office, they've still committed a felony by parking there.

So instead they'll park in the street. And if the lot is mostly empty and there's a car parked in the street in front of the post office, it's a bright neon sign to thieves that breaking into that car will score them a gun.

These people are out of their fucking minds. Nothing’s ever enough.

Post office workers' safety ruled uNcONStItuTiONaL

Jesus fucking Christ guys

I need a gun when I go to the post office to protect myself from the postal workers when they decide to go postal.

Bunch of scared insecure children on the right. Recommend a listen to Malcolm Gladwell 6 part series on gun violence for the history of the rights obsession with 2A.

I WILL FIGHT FOR MY FREEDOM IN THE POST OFFICE

NO ONE IS ALLOWED TO TAKE MY GUNS

/s

So the reason she used in her ruling is that the law about not having guns in post offices was passed in 1972. Which is pants on head crazy. Under that reasoning it's not about what powers to regulate there were traditionally. It's about specific case details, like qualified immunity. The federal government has absolutely maintained an ability to say no guns in sensitive areas from day 1 of the USA. But because they didn't get around to post offices until 1972, it's illegal to make guns illegal in post offices.

Which is not the standard SCOTUS set in Bruen. According to their standard it would be sufficient to prove early Americans would approve of such laws by finding similar laws. Not requiring that they had the same exact law.

I want to open carry an ar15 in an MRI room. If you prohibit that, you are violating my constitutional rights!

If you say that there are exceptions to those rights the I think we have a crack that we need to rip open juuuuust a little wider.

Be interesting to see how the appeal goes. It’s going to take a while to thin out those Trump judges.

this investigation is a huge waste of resources

I guess we’re just going to have regular shootouts at the ok corral.

Mass murders are constitutional?

So anyone surprised by this ruling must believe that folks, licensed and legally carrying, are disarming and leaving their shit in the car to go into specific buildings. That's stupid. All that does is leave a gun one broken window away from someone already committing crimes who in the excitement of finding a weapon might suddenly graduate to doing much worse crimes. Keeping your piece on your person, holstered and concealed is the only responsible approach if you are going to carry.

lol

lmao

When we going to have a law banning possession of weaponry that relies on scientific or engineering knowledge or techniques for which there is no historic evidence of the writers of the 2nd amendment having known of or imagined. Let's get down with this "historical tradition" muck rolling.