Put your calculators away boys. Looks like the store discovered how math works.
60 0 ReplyWhere is the midly infuriating part?
41 14 ReplyPresenting the pricing as if it represents a bulk discount when it doesn't.
The only reason to do this is to trick people who can't do multiplication into buying more.
84 3 ReplyIt probably once did, but they relabeled it.
20 1 ReplyI'd argue it's a nice thing to make the costs obvious for people who can't do multiplication.
1 1 ReplyYou can clearly see there is a sticker over the original price. It originally probably was a bulk deal that the store reduced to an all around deal.
You're over here bitching about people who can't do math and you can't even see.
10 11 Reply
Why is this downvoted. I had the same question and I was genuinely confused. Are we not allowed to ask questions :x
12 0 ReplyHow to pay 8 £^2
3 0 ReplyMove to the planet No Bloke's Land
1 0 Reply
Math
1 0 Reply
Yeah but how much for 4?
Wish I could tell you, buddy
18 0 ReplyWell 2 is between 1 and 6, 3 is between 2 and 4. So for 4 I’d say anywhere from 35 to 39 dollars. Which is, itself, a spread of 4 so you know it’s right.
19 1 ReplyI can't express the embarrassment I feel from how long it took me to understand this.
4 0 ReplyNot sure I still do
4 0 ReplyMath can be tricky
1 0 Reply
Ok.... But is ££8 more expensive than £8?
11 0 ReplyThats 8 square-pounds.
7 0 ReplyI got a square pound in my pants and I'm not even European.
3 0 Reply
4 for £33
8 0 ReplyHow much for 5?
2 0 ReplyWe haven't yet discovered the mathematics needed to answer that question
5 0 Reply
£ - 8£
9 2 Reply£ £8
11 0 Reply
It was pointed out that the first price was higher originally. The funny thing is that in that case the price of four would be nice to know. With the given information it would be economically more efficient to buy two times two if you wanted four vs one times three and then an additional one.
8 2 Reply£3... something?
5 0 ReplyNext Generation ™️ apparel teaches math 😄
3 0 Reply