Okay what does one thing have to do with the other? Saying 100 civilians without more information doesn't add or explain anything.
It looks bad and it's tragic, vut all Israel needs to do is have a good faith military target and make a good faith attempt to warn people in the area, and while it may still look bad and will still be tragic, it won't be criminal.
There are over a million people crammed into rafah right now. They were told it was a safe zone and they have nowhere else to go. And Israel bombed them, including camps of tents, with bombs that Biden gave them.
Edit: the targets also included 3 mosques and 14 homes (just like normal single family houses)
13,000 children are dead idk why ur still trying to do this. They bombed civilian targets, they have absolutely no excuse for that. Even if they are still warning people with phone calls, (which is doubtful considering that gaza doesn't have super reliable electricity and connectivity, and most of the people in rafah aren't from there so israel might not even know where they are) Israel still isn't allowed to just blow up people's houses without actual proof that the military importance of bombing said house outweighs the fact that it's civilian infrastructure. Same with mosques.
Ok, I'll be waiting here for evidence that there were tunnels being used by hamas under every single one of those homes, and that israel was using bunker busters to actually destroy them. But I don't expect i'll ever get that, because Israel consistently lies about this stuff and then just waits for people to forget it instead of backing up their claims.
Israel does have to prove that they didn't commit a horrifying war crime. Cmon.
Also its ridiculous that you're falling back on calling me antisemitic. If India did the same thing in Jammu and Kashmir, or Russia did it in Ukraine, I would also not believe any proof they presented until it was verified by a third party. That's just basic critical thinking skills.
They don't have to prove it to you, only to itself, maybe its allies. If there's a valid military target and they take reasonable caution to minimize civilian casualties, it may still be horrifying but it's literally not a war crime, and saying it is despite admitting that you don't have the evidence doesn't make it so.
In my view, the IDF is way more credible than Hamas.
Do you have like some kind of personal investment with Israel? You got my head scratching... how can you be reasonable about anything else in life, but when it comes to Palestinians being butchered, you just claim they were "reports"?