By all means, tell me what their position is. Failing that, what's the charitable assumption to make here?
As far as I can see, the likely options are:
They support the genocide
They don't care about the rule of law
The former is more common in this context, but it's both weird and worthless of you to insert yourself into the conversation to defend someone's positions that (unless you can confidently answer this question) you don't understand. Just like that, you've derailed the conversation into this irrelevant shit - what was your complaint again? Oh...
I'm not defending them. I'm pointing out your shit reasoning.
Are you 15 years old and trying to sound edgy and trendy? Are all your friends keyboard activists and you're feeling peer-pressured into typing nonsense?
Yep, there is no context for this and heavy framing in the article. I agree with both of your Disclamers, but this is just propaganda.
Dismissing HD footage of people that are clearly civilians being bombed, as propaganda.
You've presumably seen my evidence at this point - where's the evidence justifying the execution of these people? Or is it Hamas (and a death sentence) until proven innocent?
You keep using that word 'evidence', but you are absolutely clueless what it means.
I could tell you that those men are russian soldiers about to rape another child in Ukraine, and would have as much merit as that clip shared on twitter.
There's no proof of time, location, intention, identity etc. etc.
This is facebook-mom levels of nonsense.
'HD footage', you're even parroting the nonsense terms you learned from your peers.
Talking about 'until proven innocent', why are you automatically assuming the Israeli is at fault here? Where's the trial? Are you an anti-semite? Is this a race thing (again)?
You have no fucking clue who the targets were, how long have they been under surveillance, what they were doing, where they were going. This video is literally rage bait for facebook moms and teen-keyboard-activists. Share it so people think you're cool.
A video CAN work as evidence, but it has to bo supported by a million other things. Saying otherwise dismisses all the hard work people are actually doing ivestigating each and every single warcrime and potential warcrime.
I can make a video of you torturing a puppy with a "I can't believe..." headline in 30minutes if you want. But it wouldn't be proof, nor evidence that it's you, that it's now, etc.
Jesus, thanks for making me spell it out for you...
Again, clearly civilians - we'll need evidence to the contrary - particularly when 60%-70% of the Palestinians killed have been children. Guess they were Hamas too, right?
Did you read what whas said in that article, or...?
You have yet to quote where the other person denied genocide, or was even slightly racist.
You haven't even denied you're an anti-semite ("clearly"). Stop defending hamas!!!! /s
Also, you highlighted perfectly, perfectly how videos like this have no merit. One side says they're civilians, the other - terrorists. And it's absolutely will not be known until this is investigated properly, not by keyboard warriors and facebook moms, but by people who matter.
Did you read what whas said in that article, or...?
Yep - the IDF said they killed them, so you'll be falling back from that dumb position to the next one - they were Hamas (like all those kids) I'll let you point out the evidence that's the case.
Also, you highlighted perfectly, perfectly how videos like this have no merit. One side says they're civilians, the other - terrorists.
When 60%+ of the people you're killing are children and you're spouting openly genocidal rhetoric while making unsubstantiated claims those you're killing are terrorists, it's responsible to ask for evidence from the perspective of the rule of law (remember when you got all salty about that) and assessing warcrimes. You don't get to bomb someone, just say they're a terrorist, and walk free.
it's absolutely will not be known until this is investigated properly, not by keyboard warriors and facebook
Ah yes - kill 'em all and (fail to) find the evidence to justify killing them later.
...but you care about genocide the rule of law, right?