President's handling hits new lows; Democrats have grown less supportive of aid to Israel.
An increasing number of Americans want Joe Biden to encourage Israel to stop military actions in Gaza; and Mr. Biden's handling of the situation is now down to its lowest levels yet.
In the poll, conducted before Iran's drone and missile attack on Israel, there wasn't much clamor among the U.S. public for U.S. military action against Iran, were Iran to strike Israel. More would instead have the U.S. support Israel's next actions.
Biden has been encouraging Israel to show restraint from the beginning. He has set conditions on arms delivered. He is slow-walking arms deliveries. He is also getting strong criticism for not helping Israel enough.
The US is also using loopholes to keep over 100 arms sales under the radar, including thousands of bombs. “This doesn’t just seem like an attempt to avoid technical compliance with US arms export law, it’s an extremely troubling way to avoid transparency and accountability on a high-profile issue,” Ari Tolany, director of the security assistance monitor at the Centre for International Policy thinktank, said" and added “They’re very much borrowing from the Trump playbook to dodge congressional oversight”.
No matter your stance on what Biden should be doing, why do you call that "slow-walking arms deliveries"? Seems like you're trying to rewrite the history of how strongly and swiftly Biden has supported Israel - aka doing election season damage control regardless of evidence.
Except every time Ukraine attempted to join NATO, Russia attacks them. A nation at war is ineligible for NATO admission. It’s no accident. Putin does not want to share a border with a NATO ally.
They don't need to be in NATO for us to store weapons there. We have plenty of bases in non NATO countries. We've even had bases in countries the Russians invaded. (Georgia, 2008)
But also, NATO doesn't actually have that as a hard rule. There's been debate about it and NATO Members are wary of such a member pulling everyone into a war right away, but there's nothing stopping them from doing it.
Biden is going to further jeopardize his reelection chances
We've all seen this movie - this is the part where the big bad humiliates the (supposed) "good cop," and now "good cop" is going to hand over to "bad cop."
He didn't need to set conditions, the Leahy Law already does that. His conditions were a smoke screen so Israel could self certify they aren't doing anything and people would be mollified. The law already bans weapons exports to countries with credible accusations of human rights abuses. And we've been past that point for months now.
Strange that you can just completely lie and get upvoted. Biden has done everything Netanyahu asked him to and there are no conditions on arms deliveries.
Joe Biden himself has said he unconditionally supports israel.
You mean when I posted links debunking fake israeli rape Hasbara from the NYT that turned out to be completely false but the mods didn't like non Western sources debunking israeli propaganda?
You do it all the time. I don’t see why you suddenly have a problem with it.
Quite an accusation. Have specific proof to make it credible? Because at first glance it seems like an incredibly childish response. As you've written it it's functionally just "NO YOU!" With evidence it could be salvaged into a valid point poorly made. Although it should be noted you don't even attempt to deal with the substance of their argument, opting instead to just insult them.
My mod log? I've been here two months and never had a post removed by a mod period. You're flat-out lying at this point and I dare you to prove otherwise. He said he accused the wrong person (me) and to me that's completely fair because I certainly make mistakes.
Maybe consider backing up your accusations when you get aggressive before you get offended when you're called out on a lack of proof. Burden of proof is on the accuser. Edit: Nice edit to delete half of the above comment and make it appear as if this isn't responding to your specific insult.
No. For starters: the demand that I butt out because it's not my business is coming from someone who involved themselves in an argument that wasn't theirs to kick off the whole conversation. You can begin participation/speak up whenever you find fault but I can't? 2nd - if you don't want public scrutiny of bad arguments, don't make bad arguments publicly. Your post as written was nothing more than unfounded bullying (didn't deal with the argument, was just character assassination, and accusers must provide proof). I even said you could salvage it with evidence.
As his history shows, Linkerbaan has one interest: talk shit about the US and its president. I know what I think of single/wedge-issue posters who queue flood dozens articles a week like it’s their job.