Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section. Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war. Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.
Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.
Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:
Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.
https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language. https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one. https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts. https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel. https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator. https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps. https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language. https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language. https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses. https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.
Question A: Do you agree with allowing the complementary support of the Armed Forces in the functions of the National Police to combat organized crime, by partially reforming the Constitution?
YES 73.52%
NO 26.48%
Question B: Do you agree with allowing the extradition of Ecuadorians, with the conditions, requirements, restrictions and impediments established in the Constitution, international instruments and the law, by amending the Constitution and reforming the laws?
YES 66.61%
NO 33.39%
Question C: Do you agree with the creation of magistrates specialized in constitutional matters, both in the first and second instance, for the knowledge of the jurisdictional guarantees that correspond to them, by amending the Constitution and reforming the Organic Law on Jurisdictional Guarantees and Constitutional Control?
YES 62.44%
NO 37.56%
Question D: Do you agree that the Ecuadorian state recognizes international arbitration as a method for resolving investment, contractual or commercial disputes?
NO 60.44%
YES 39.56%
Question E: Do you agree with the amendment of the Constitution of the Republic and the reform of the Labor Code for fixed-term and hourly employment contracts, when these are concluded for the first time between the same employer and worker, without prejudice to workers' acquired rights?
NO 64.42%
YES 35.58%
Question F: Do you agree with the Armed Forces carrying out permanent checks on weapons, ammunition, explosives and accessories on the roads, paths, highways and corridors authorized for entry into social rehabilitation centers?
YES 71.67%
NO 28.33%
Question G: Do you agree with increasing the penalties for crimes of terrorism and its financing, illicit production and trafficking of scheduled substances subject to control, organized crime, homicide, murder for hire, trafficking in human beings, kidnapping for ransom, drug trafficking, money laundering and illicit activity of mining resources, by reforming the Comprehensive Organic Penal Code?
YES 69.58%
NO 30.42%
Question H: Do you agree that people deprived of their liberty should serve their full sentence in a social rehabilitation center for the crimes detailed in the Annex to the question, by reforming the Comprehensive Organic Penal Code?
YES 68.99%
NO 31.01%
Question I: Do you agree with criminalizing the possession or carrying of weapons, ammunition or components that are for the exclusive use of the Armed Forces or the National Police, without affecting firearms permitted for civilian use, by reforming the Comprehensive Organic Penal Code?
YES 66.56%
NO 33.44%
Question J: Do you agree that weapons, their parts, explosives, ammunition or accessories that have been instruments or material objects of a crime can be used immediately by the National Police or the Armed Forces, reforming the Comprehensive Organic Criminal Code?
YES 66.63%
NO 33.37%
Question K: Do you agree that the State should become the holder (owner) of assets of illicit or unjustified origin, simplifying the procedure of the Organic Law on the Forfeiture of Assets?