I do not like distributed, community-driven leadership. The more leadership is shared, the more arguments there are, and the less gets done.
I would rather have a strong dictatorship focused on technical merit, to be deposed in the future for another dictator, again, based on technical merit.
I've been on a team where two co-chair leads bickered and eventually split. I was a member in both of the new teams (two projects) and both turned out great for different reasons.
I plan to do the same with Nix and Aux even if everyone else picks sides. And I'm glad the link was posted here.