This page lists Wikipedia pages by the total amount of text in all of their talk page archives put together. It is the best measure there is for determining how much squabbling has gone on behind the scenes for a given page.
Here is a ranking of all 63 of the listed pages that are actual articles (as opposed to policy/administrative/user pages), in descending order:
Donald Trump
Intelligent design
Climate change
Barack Obama
United States
Jesus
Race and intelligence
Catholic Church
Circumcision
Homeopathy
Muhammad
Gamergate (harassment campaign)
Chiropractic
Abortion
Monty Hall problem
Gaza War (2008-2009)
Evolution
Prem Rawat
Sarah Palin
India
Israel
World War II
Christ myth theory
Mass killings under communist regimes
Jehovah's Witnesses
September 11 attacks
Cold fusion
Climatic Research Unit email controversy
Armenian genocide
Anarchism
Atheism
Falun Gong
Neuro-linguistic programming
Jerusalem
Control of cities during the Syrian civil war
Kosovo
British Isles
Transcendental Meditation
United Kingdom
George W. Bush
Christianity
COVID-19 pandemic
Libertarianism
Acupuncture
Thomas Jefferson
International recognition of Kosovo
Israel and apartheid
Adolf Hitler
United States and state terrorism
Syrian civil war
List of best-selling music artists
Julian Assange
Russo-Georgian War
Historicity of Jesus
Second Amendment to the United States Constitution
Tea Party movement
List of common misconceptions
Murder of Meredith Kercher
Genesis creation narrative
Taiwan
Hillary Clinton
Electronic cigarette
Michael Jackson
Bubbling under (present in earlier versions; I have gone back to 2015 so far here, though the page history goes back to 2010):
0.999...
European Union
Chronic fatigue syndrome
Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections
Shakespeare authorship question
Fascism
Astrology
The Holocaust
Joseph Smith
Chelsea Manning
List of scientists who disagree with the scientific consensus on global warming [NOTE: now deleted]
telling people this is due to mystical nonexistent spirochetes in their blood that can only be treated with a long course of IV antibiotics.
Right, that's exactly what I said. Just like I said Long Covid is actually the result of vaccines. Seriously, you're telling me "my posts" (btw, what are you even referring to? Do we have a history or something?) are this thing you've made up in your head about me because I am pointing out the FACT that a condition exists despite many misled denialists. Chronic Lyme is as real as long covid is even though we don't know what the underlying cause of it is.
The medical reality is the symptoms people experience
No shit! Which is because Lyme Disease is real! Fucking hell, what is your problem?
Calling it chronic lyme links it to a mechanical explanation that is totally nonsensical. Just call it chronic fatigue syndrome then, or fibro. You can't play games here, you know what calling it chronic lyme means. There isn't even a coherent agreed-upon set of symptoms.
No, because that denies that it is linked to the initial Lyme infection somehow and may well have a completely different cause than the more general chronic fatigue or fibromyalgia. Again, that would be like telling people just to call long covid "chronic fatigue."
Those other conditions can be triggered by infections so I don't see what the issue is given the enormous amount of bullshit baggage brought in by calling it chronic lyme.
I had already typed up a response to this when I noticed you went back and edited your previous comment to add shit about me "playing games." So nevermind, not worth it. I'm tired of this obnoxious thing where you make these personal accusations like how I'm "playing games" and about "my posts" (while repeatedly editing your own!) when you don't even know what you're talking about wrt to me or the topic. It's not worth trying to engage with someone who pulls that comment editing shit and attacks me personally for things they made up whole cloth. I'm not playing games here and anyone reading this who wants to learn more about the reality of Lyme and the very real long term problems it causes in many patients diagnosed with it, as well as the hype around unsupported explanations for them that are almost certainly garbage (which I never denied) are welcome to do so without me having to defend myself against your weird toxicity.
All my comments were edited seconds after posting them when I noticed things I wanted to change. imo it's toxic to ascribe doubt of pseudoscientific bullshit to liberalism. As though our scientific view of society isn't what puts us above liberal magical thought about how the market solves everything. I almost certainly know more about lyme than you do.