Yes, when a dictator actively oppressing his people, particularly women, says you're doing good, you should feel proud.
Edit:
Published on his official website on Thursday, the letter addresses students whose “awakened conscience has moved them to defend the oppressed women and children of Gaza.”
Fun fact: awful people agreeing for bad reasons doesn't make the cause itself bad. You're falling for one of the oldest yellow journalism tricks in the book.
This is the equivalent of the National Cattlemen's Beef Association publishing an excerpt from Mein Kampf extolling the virtues of vegetarianism.
What do you think of George Galloway's condemning Israel? He's right, but he has a few flaws (though certainly not as bad as the Nazis—I was a little ticked at people citing him several hours ago, though).
he's doing what all right wing populists are doing these days; latching onto a popular movement and using it to both improve his popularity and divide his enemies
You'd be hard pressed to find someone to the left of Bernie Sanders who doesn't support Iranians protesting the right to not be killed for wearing a hijab improperly.
Do you feel like there are only two choices? I support Israel striking back when Hamas started a war they had no chance of winning. Doesn't mean I support how they're doing it and I don't think the crimes they're committing currently are any good.
So yes, they should feel "proud" a scumbag like Trump endorses them.
In an ideal world both the students and Israel would say "wait, that piece of shit says we're doing good, maybe we should take 5 to rethink what we're doing". But we don't live in an ideal world.
As a side note, I truly envy people who can view things so clearly so easily, like unequivocally supporting Palestine or Israel without seeing the very shitty things both are (or were recently) doing. While I envy such people, I definitely don't want to be around them - people who have easy answers to complex issues are rarely correct.
It's very well known that the AA is basically just Tayyip's propoganda machine. It's a very hard bias towards whatever he's looking to say, at that point in time, not necessarily right or left wing.
That's probably why they're writing about it: to make the uninformed equate anti genocide protesters and anyone else who objects to the atrocities being committed by the Israeli apartheid regime with him.
Hey it's not like we can pick and choose what old fucks like to say on TV or to the press... especially if it's conveniently what Israel apologists want to happen.
If the U.S. and overall Western Powers minded it's own fkin business...
The 1953 Iranian coup d'état, known in Iran as the 28 Mordad coup d'état (Persian: کودتای ۲۸ مرداد), was the U.S.- and British-instigated, Iranian army-led overthrow of the elected Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh in favor of strengthening the monarchical rule of the shah, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, on 19 August 1953
Isn't that interesting? We fail to really investigate how something comes to fruition. But then again we rely on investigative journalists.. who are owned by corporations who tell them what and how to report.
Had the Western powers minded its business, Iran would have still been friendly and continued to incorporate Western values. But they learned their lesson, they swayed from the path and got burned. Not making that mistake again, eh?
The president died. Iran's president is the head of government and second-highest political position, while the supreme leader is the head of state and highest political position.
Congratulations to a small percentage of US students. When Iran's supreme leader backs you, it shouldn't ring any alarm bells. You are definitely making wise choices.