Claudia Sheinbaum, part of the left-wing and populist Morena party to which AMLO also belongs, is now the first woman to ascend to the Mexican presidency. She is also a climate/energy scientist and was previously mayor of Mexico City. Results indicate that she has won with approximately 60% of the vote, which would be the highest vote percentage in Mexican history.
AMLO's presidency has been generally successful. He campaigned on reducing violence inside Mexico, and while this has technically occurred if measured from 2018, homicides are still considerably higher than in 2010. This is largely due to warring drug cartels, which are more reflective of the United States and its rise in drug addiction and thus imports from Mexico. He also campaigned on reducing corruption, which he also kinda has, and also on reducing income inequality, which he also kinda has. The overall figures don't show massive budges in income inequality, but the minimum wage has risen by 82% and manufacturing wage have risen 27%, and this plus other social programs has lifted 9 million Mexicans out of extreme poverty - a good achievement - but not much further than that, with poverty rates still above the Latin American average. Unemployment is officially at record lows, but much of this job growth has been in the informal sector.
The Mexican economy suffered greatly during the pandemic, and while growth since then has been pretty decent, the economy is still below where it was in 2018. As Mexican capitalists do not pay much in taxes, AMLO's programs have required large budget deficits and borrowing. These capitalists are, of course, not doing many productive investments and thus there is not much productivity growth; productivity has been more-or-less stagnant for two decades. The reason why Mexican capitalists are not investing is because of the major decline in profitability since the 1990s - there is no reason to invest if your money is at major risk of not making a profit. Therefore, they have followed the trend of other national capitalists of investing in real estate and speculation, particularly in American companies.
Since NAFTA/USMCA, Mexico has become increasingly dependent on the United States for a location for its exports, while the US has exploited cheap labour in Mexico. Additionally, with the anti-Chinese sanctions increasingly put in place by the US, Mexico has become one of several conduits for China to redirect its goods so that they can still reach American markets. This has allowed Mexico to have an essentially balanced trade account and keep the peso relatively strong against the dollar.
Mexico's limited fortunes will likely decline from here as the US economy continues to slow. If Trump is elected, he may decree protectionist policies which will hit a US-reliant Mexico quite hard. Additionally, industrial production has recently declined and retail spending is also down. AMLO's presidency was genuinely beneficial for the poorest 50%, but the policies he created failed to really change the fundamentals of the economy. He relied on the private sector rather than the public sector. This is not entirely his fault - if he had tried to do anything terribly transformative, Mexico would have probably been hit hard with consequences by the US and simultaneously faced a domestic revolt by Mexican capitalists. There were and are already threats of outright invasion in response to the limited things AMLO has already done.
In an increasingly multipolar future in which America becomes weaker and weaker, it's very possible that Mexico's reliance on the US will decrease, allowing parties to be more radical without facing the possibility of facing crippling sanctions like Venezuela. However, Mexico's sheer proximity to the US means that they might be among the last countries to break free of American influence, as the US will continue to bitterly resist any attempt to break down the Monroe Doctrine long after it loses Asia, Europe, and Africa. So, it seems likely that Sheinbaum may soon find herself in a situation where she is forced by capitalists to implement fiscal austerity regardless of her intentions, which is equivalent to a declaration of war on the working class. What happens then is anybody's guess.
The COTW (Country of the Week) label is designed to spur discussion and debate about a specific country every week in order to help the community gain greater understanding of the domestic situation of often-understudied nations. If you've wanted to talk about the country or share your experiences, but have never found a relevant place to do so, now is your chance! However, don't worry - this is still a general news megathread where you can post about ongoing events from any country.
The Country of the Week is Mexico! Feel free to chime in with books, essays, longform articles, even stories and anecdotes or rants. More detail here.
Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section. Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war. Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.
Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.
Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:
Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.
https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language. https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one. https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts. https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel. https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator. https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps. https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language. https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language. https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses. https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.
Ok but has one of the substack writers or other arm chair general bloggers explained why or how? As a tactical matter? As a political/strategic matter?
pumping water into the tunnels mathematically cannot work at the rates that Israel could feasibly do it as Hamas has already figured out the problem of getting rid of water that accumulates naturally via infiltration from the sea and rainfall. the secondary effect would be to destroy Gaza's aquifer, but again, this would take several years of constant pumping to make it too saline to be undrinkable (and even then, rainfall would help to combat this over time). I suspect Israel knew both of those facts but was eating sufficient shit that they had to look like they were doing something for the domestic audience
why the bunker busters didn't work is a little unclear to me but I suspect it's a combination of subterranean reinforcement of some kind (these clearly aren't just holes in dirt), knowing where to drop the bombs to actually have an effect is near-impossible, and the sheer number of tunnels makes getting rid of a meaningful number of them very difficult and expensive. finding tunnels underground with geological surveying methods is still pretty tough even if the tunnels are relatively shallow (<10 meters) and even if you already know where they are, so you're essentially limited to soldiers scouting around and trying to find them, which must be an absolute nightmare in an urban environment where your enemy has more initimate knowledge of their surroundings, the civilians are unfriendly to you and so probably won't act as informants, and when most of your training was spent shooting children and thus not having the slightest clue what to do when your enemy has any weapon more advanced than a rock
add on that Hamas can always just dig more tunnels while you're trying to destroy them (not every person in Hamas will be fighting all the time, some are clearly there only to create explosives and dig tunnels) and I think Israel could occupy Gaza for a decade and still not clear even a majority of the tunnels. whatever figure they're trotting out about how 294% of the tunnels in X region are dismantled is copium of the highest order, if it's as high as 20% in any single part of Gaza I'd be utterly shocked
Medium answer: Qassem Soleimani and Hajj Radwan organized a team of the smartest military minds and engineers from Palestine Lebanon and Iran to help create the tunnel doctrine for Gaza and then the Palestinians spent 16 years building these tunnels knowing to prepare for chemical weapons, bunker busters, and possible flooding. Add onto this that only a handful of people ever have had knowledge of the complete layout.
They call it the "Gaza Metro" for a reason.
One day portions of it will be turned into a museum honoring the victory of al Aqsa Flood inshallah
yes, I don't think people who talk about "clearing the tunnels" really have a good idea of the absolute engineering marvel that they are and how much preparation has gone into them. It would be easy to dismiss them as like, "this is what a couple hundred malnourished Hamas militants could scrape together in a couple years" if you're only going by Israeli propaganda, but no - in fact, this might be the single highest achievement in guerrilla warfare ever.
and then consider what Hezbollah and Ansarallah and fucking Iran have probably constructed underneath their territory to protect from airstrikes, with even more resources and people to build them, and one starts to wonder if the combined might of Western airforces and even the Israeli nuclear arsenal could actually defeat the Resistance.
If I remember the rate of water they were pumping, it was nothing in comparison to the amount of rainfall Gaza gets per year. So all the water likely just dispersed into the water table
If you are not sending people into the tunnels to clear them, you will never actually be able to meaningfully deal with them. You need tunnel rats and no one wants to do it.