Starfield’s Paid Mods Ignite A Review Bombing On Steam
Starfield’s Paid Mods Ignite A Review Bombing On Steam
Frustration over paid mods continues to be a sore spot among fans (and critics) of Bethesda games
You're viewing a single thread.
I was waiting for it. There was zero chance Todd Howard didn’t try this again.
This is why you don’t buy Bethesda games. Half finished and now they want to profit from modding efforts like a new stream of microtransactions.
47 0 ReplyI want paid mods. I've got no problem with non-paid mods existing too, but I'd like to have the opportunity to pay to accelerate the rate of content creation.
I've got no problem with people who don't want to buy them, but I think that those people shouldn't take issue with people who do want them.
5 45 ReplySo donate to the modders. It's not a hard concept.
Fuck Todd for wanting to profit off of them.
49 0 ReplyNothing wrong with donating to modders under the current model.
People who don't want paid mods can have what they want under the current system just fine. Just don't buy mods.
However, not having paid mods means that...people who do want them can't have paid mods.
2 30 ReplyNo, it means people that want paid mods can just donate, and people that don't want them aren't excluded.
14 0 ReplyThat's just saying "I don't want paid mods to exist if I don't want to buy them myself".
2 4 Reply
Its microtransactions in a single player offline game. Most of which isnt made bgs, but made by others, and bgs just takes a cut.
5 1 Reply
The problem is that Bethesda wants to take a cut. I have no problem paying a modder for their hard work, but Bethesda shouldn't be getting anything.
10 0 Reply