What I meant was that if they were signatories to the Rome Statute at the time, actions they committed would quality for war crime charges.

As far as if it's worth it? I would say yes. It would legitimize US in the global community. Right now everyone knows US is the biggest hypocrite on the world stage.

Your comment could have been removed under multiple rules, but rule 4 was used, as there is no need to disparage a religion. I'm no scholar, but courts decided that Muhammad actions didn't constitute a pedophilia.

You are welcome to express your opinion, no matter how popular or unpopular it might be. Just be nice.

Your comment in "How ‘Zionist’ became a slur on the US left" posted in !globalnews@lemmy.zip was removed.
Reason: Rule 4.

Please read the community rules.

No. Like any court, they only deal with people physically in front of them.

Every design is different, and every design choice has advantages and penalties. In short, Airbus doesn't use them because of increased fuel consumption, since they found other ways to reduce noise.

America keeps fighting fascism outside of US, but invites it with open arms to their legislative bodies. Look for the post in !databreaches@lemmy.zip once the data is inevitably leaked.

About half of the remaining ~130 are presumed dead, but only 36 are confirmed by Israel or Hamas.

Smartest living engineer on earth, according to himself. Defeated by a simple judge...

They booted him not for the alleged misconduct, but the possible investigation of that allegation, according to their statement to the press. By that standard, both should be removed. It's the hypocrisy that's at issue, not that he might being innocent. If you claim to have a standard, but only enforce it selectively, it's no longer a standard.

The contest organisers said "it would not be appropriate" for Klein to participate "while the legal process takes place".

It has no bearing that the contestant personally didn't do anything. They banned Russia from participating for the actions of a state.

And allegation is not proof anything happened, it's just an unsupported accusation. Any person can accuse someone else of something, that doesn't mean it's true.

"Interesting" is a perspective. Something that one might find interesting, another finds absolutely boring. As a post author, I do find it interesting, since it's extremely rare that someone gets disqualified from the event. Especially since they refused to do that of Israel who are being investigated by ICC for genocide, yet they booted Netherlands for mere probability of the police investigation.

Consider what we used as currency before it was currency. You would have to barter before, which was inefficient. Common currency saves you and everyone involved time. Instead of having to barter for every item, which would also require you to do carry all of those items, you can just pay with currency now.

Never trust cloud. Unless you own the cloud, you don't have any control.

Are you from Belarus or know anyone in real life that lives there? Because I do, and I can tell you with certainty that people who live there have a different view from yours. So you can insist it's a NATO propaganda, but I'm sorry I will believe people I actually know and trust over you.

russia is currently a vital part in the worldwide anti imperialist axis of resistance

That is rich since imperialist Russia is the one who is occupying parts of Moldova, Georgia, and Ukraine.

You claim to be in support of Russia, yet you misrepresent them and their goals. Putin himself said he's an imperialist and his primary goal before his death is to restore former USSR territories.

This opinion is on par for the Eurasia program as a whole, which the author is part of. I would be curious to see if they have the same opinion of US supporting Israel for 75 years as "unnecessary, dangerous, and costly".

The only peace agreements Russia ever offered was making Ukraine another puppet state like Belarus. Which basically required them to demilitarize so that Russia could integrate them into Russia officially at a later point.

If we are just talking about personal or theoretical goals, then sure. But if we want to subsidize the whole market with taxpayer money, then I have to disagree.

EVs only minimizes the CO2 consumption, since actual car production (especially batteries) creates stitton of CO2. So while it's better, incentivizing something that still contributes to the problem is not a real solution.

There is https://friendi.ca

Maybe in California where state law made them void, but everywhere else they were definitely enforceable. And even challenging it would cost a shitton of money.

That's not what I'm saying. We are past the point of being able to reverse the harm already done, but we can still limit the future harm. And that is critical. The current world is still livable, alternative is portions of the world becomes unlivable.

And who knows, maybe some future tech will make possible what is impossible today.