Jim9222 @ Jim9222 @lemmy.world Posts 0Comments 24Joined 1 yr. ago
What drives you to defend UHC CEO?
Edit. I apologize to those going through the thread and seeing this divulge into pointless trolling back and forth. There is nothing of substance on this point on within this thread line. If you're interested in examples of conversational redirection in practice
This abhorrent behavior that folks are supporting on the left is fairly similar to the rights support of Kyle Rittenhouse's abhorrent behavior
Kyle Rittenhouse's murder was in defense of himself, after he placed himself in a position to defend and support store fronts in another state
Luigi Mangione murder was on the offensive due to the assumed corruption of the health care system and how that personally negatively impacted his life
But the CEO was doing his job, the best he could. True
Is the left going to start attacking everyone they perceive as negatively impacting their lives? Are they going to start killing cops, teachers, and doctors? Doubtful. Killing a cop isn't going to fix a corrupt system and rarely can you point at a cop and directly correlate their decisions and actions to negatively impacting tens of thousands of individuals. Killing a teacher or a doctor wouldn't make sense because these workers actions are largely on rails. They can only do so much until they run out of funding or time. Which is similar to the CEOs role. The major difference is that the CEOs have a lot more perceived autonomy. When they have to make a decision of general wellness for the majority vs record profits and they choose record profits due to academic training, pressure from peers, and legal reasons demanding profits for the stakeholders it exposes that the system is failing the majority of people. This directly leads to eating the wealthy because there must be some way to improve the situation that's tried and true
I'm not sure what the right perceives as go time to start taking action to protect themselves from oppression. I witnessed 09-11 as a child. That made sense why we went to war. Since then, seen lots of growing rage and shouts against oppression but I've been struggling to understand why from the rights perspective but it makes sense from the left perspective
Yea from what I can tell, it's the same but worse
First before you even have the wait period you must go to court in order to file for the waiting period to begin. Additionally you have to pay a fee to even begin the wait process
After the 120 days is up, you have a period of time to gather docs and obtain a court date for the final hearing. Failing to prepare during this period or engage the court for the final hearing will likely restart the entire process including waiting another 120 days and having to file and pay the fee with the Circuit Court
I honestly can't tell from the article what "appointment" means but it sure seems synonymous with us having to go to court multiple times to initiate the process and conclude it
If I replace court appearances with appointment to align with the article. Then in WI you have a bare minimum of two appointments. If you have kids or need petitions for support to go through with the motion. You can have up to four appointments. Not acknowledging you may be forced to complete parenting courses before the final hearing is allowed to occur
In the great state of Wisconsin, there is a 120 day waiting period after filing and paying the Clerk of the Circuit Court. After the 120 days then you can obtain a date for a final court hearing before it becomes legally accepted
So it could be much worse. It could be Wisconsin