When your thirty year plan as a governor is just to keep the Florida man meme alive forever.
Less than .05% of "other elections." How obvious does this need to be for you?
Not what I implied at all... Defensive much?
A party that is only interested in moonshots isn't a serious party.
With something like 50% appointment rate, largely due to uncontested elections. In other words, less than 250 run compared to 520k other party contenders. This is less than .05% green, yet they think they should be on 100% of presidential races.
What percentage do the names of the literal entirety of current elected green officials you listed, as granularity as local elections, represent of the total elected positions? Hint: in 1992 that total was about 520,000 people.
Edit: lol didn't even realize you included former appointments.
It seems that they pretend to care on a cycle of 4 ish years. After the election, they're going to push the envelope for 3.5 years again. Credit is earned through sustained action. Virtually everything I've seen about Facebook's policy enforcement makes it clear to me that the misleading content that makes it to the top on there is a cultivated and desired consequence of the moderation team from the top down.
Well famously when the Black Panthers had guns they had a very different tune. Hypocrisy is sorta their bread and butter
They must have let people from each state make their own graph.
I've said it before, I'll say it every time it's proven again: US consumers get more protection from tech company overreach from EU courts than our own. Our agencies need to have big gnarly angelfish teeth, not this wrist slapping "as long as you share the profits it's basically legal" nonsense.
You're pathetically apathetic, not fearful, congrats.
That's not what I said. You ironically refuse the existence of the other category, lol. Freudian inspiration for that?
Your post history shows exactly what I said.
That was obvious from the get-go, but now that you've demonstrated evidence for why you act the way you do, it's no longer interesting.
"Living in fear" is very different from the reality of what you argue for, which is "being apathetic to those who will suffer from the consequences of my actions"
You quoted me saying either and then didn't include the other possibility lol... Yes, Trump voters all fit into one of those two categories, making you not much different.
Never said you didn't live a full life, wanted praise, that you wrote the article, or that the community should censor you. Being selfish is antisocial, and you spend your whole time in here complaining that you get downvoted, dismissed wholehearted, ridiculed, interspersed with missing everyone's points about why something is empathetic to do, and why what you spread isn't. I don't think you do any of that for praise, I think you either don't have fully functional empathy or you're too into weeds to find your way out through logic. I don't believe you can logic anyone out of a belief if they didn't logic their way into it and so the way they lurch back to their original nonsense is always more telling than the nonsense itself.
"I'm voting for my values, and I'm not scared of Trump. I won't vote out of fear." This is the epitome of privilege, and why people dislike you. I think that warrants more introspection.
[Pause for introspection]
Do other people have things to fear about his idealogy? How precisely do you suggest that they deal with that risk? If you don't fear him and what he'll do to you, and you don't care what he'll do to other people who don't deserve it enough to lift a finger, or put your purity politics aside, then you are selfish and idiologically unfit for the 2 party system that we currently live in. A based person with your ideals would vote for what's better based on the system we have rather than the system they want, and then lobby, call, donate, and canvas for system that they want.
So we arrive at two options, either you are a sociopath who doesn't understand why letting bad things happen to other people is bad, or you're incredibly uninformed about the ramnifications of your actions whether purposefully or unintentionally... or you're an AI bot wasting everyone's time being fed prompts by some shithead Jimmy Dore type. It doesn't really matter because the explanation has been given to you dozens of times and you some how read enough to respond to it all and then completely miss the point about other people being important, not just yourself. Anti-social bellyaching isn't going to get you any praise online in largely progressive circles.
Thanks, but did you have to send me a pop-up to tell me that?! I'm at work and had to turn my phone off. I'll let my grandson figure it out
Hi Jane, it's Martha. Let me know if you get this, I'm new to computers and the Facebook app but someone said you can talk to friends on here. Did I do it right?
It said someone else liked this but I'm only talking to Jane. Can other people see this? Please don't eavesdrop, Jane has marriage issues so i wanted this to be private.
Stop blowing up my phone!!!!!!@@@!!! I'm done talking to this thread leave me alone!!! How do I stop pop ups?
Every single one stood firm about the importance of precedence, then immediately started legislating from the bench.
They will just lie to get through. It worked for his SCOTUS nominees.
