Swordgeek @ swordgeek @lemmy.ca Posts 31Comments 744Joined 1 yr. ago
One thing occurred to me.
By saying 'we will introduce a non-confidence vote,' he has some leeway in when it happens. If he holds off for a few weeks, he can actually push bavk the date while pressuring Trudeau.
Meanwhile, Poilievre is going to introduce a motion the second that house is back in session, and Singh can choose to ignore it if he wants because Poilievre jumped the gun.
Every single one of them should be on trial. Every one convicted should be labeled a dangerous offender and never see the light of day again for the rest of their lives.
No leniency. No mercy.
Regardless, my point was more to do with whether someone with only $50 to spare a month is truly in a position to invest in anything or whether they might be better off saving it for a rainy day or something like that.
True enough, but short-term or non-locked-in investments are available to most people.
If OP doesn't have the starting funds to buy an investment vehicle of some sort, then they could put it into a zero-fee savings account and vigorously ignore it. This is, in fact, your rainy day fund.
Then when they have scrounged up the appropriate amount (likely $500 or $1k), they can buy a guaranteed investment certificate or the like, and get better interest rates while they continue to put money into their account.
When the term is up, they can buy a bigger one with their new savings. This way, they have both an emergency fund, and the starting point for a life of investing towards retirement, if nothing else.
(Of course your later point - if they're struggling to eat - is still true as well.)
Absolutely 100% yes yes yes.
Compounding is your friend. You can play with the values all you want, but this calculator showed me that if you deposited $50/month at 5%/year compounded annually, you'd end up making >$1800 in profit over ten years. Realistically, you should be able to get a better rate and shorter compounding periods once you've passed the threshold amount for a mutual fund or GIC.
And that's assuming you never increase your deposits.
Realistically, whenever you get a raise you should assign some of it to increasing your monthly payments. Your goal should be to increase your payments faster than inflation. Get a $2/hr raise? That'll probably add $250/month to your paycheque after taxes. You should be able to squirrel away $25/month from that at least.
Here's a great piece of advice from The Wealthy Barber (Canadian financial dude): Pay yourself first. See if you can get your investment amount taken directly off your pay, and then you'll never see it, thus be tempted to spend it.
His other advice is to set a goal of 10% of your income to invest for retirement. Seems like a lot, but it's doable for most people who are talking about investing anything, like you.
Remember: The biggest factor in how much you make from investments over time is how early you invest. Invest now. Invest regularly.
Pet insurance is a good thing for people with a large number of animals - particularly rescue animal boarding.
For most people though, no.
None.
Because I hate people.
Every time I see an article like this my instinct is to should "no shit, Sherlock!" Except that of course many people (politicians especially) would like to pretend otherwise, as an excuse to keep it illegal.
We had a chinook hit this morning (Foehn wind, causes huge quick warming). Temperature went from -16 to +6 (Celsius) in about 12 hours, so the latest layer of snow is probably going to melt, revealing a back yard full of dog crap. I'll have to clean it up before the next snow.
As much as you can argue that all politicians are villains to some degree, Smith was there LONG LONG LONG ago.
She became party leader with a promise of batshit insanity, and was then (re-)elected to power on a platform of cruelty and regression.
She's an evil, sadistic, psychopath.
As someone not in the US, I'm hoping someone can explain.
Trump isn't in office yet. How can he have any say in this, other than just blowing hot air?
Not 'or,' 'and.'
Permanently Deleted
Insecure, contrarian, infantile.
Microsoft won't let users opt-out. Period. Full stop.
They have aggressively pushed the narrative that they know what's best for you for decades, and more recently have decided that what is best for you is ehatever makes them the most money.
This is just MS controlling your experience arbitrarily, like they always fo.
No, western Canada. Calgary.
Danielle Smith Is Hijacking Alberta Pensions for Ideological Ends
FTFY
Washing soap into the sewer system is a no-no. You can wash your car with plain water, but that's it.
I'm slightly jealous. Hand-washing your car on your driveway or street is illegal here.
(Not that it makes any difference today when it's -16C and snowing.)
Gods, I'd love to disconnect. Not really feasible.
But the head Nazi says stupid shit on social media with the sole purpose of pissing people off. Canadian news media righteously repeat it ad nauseam. Then more social media (Lemmy) righteously links to the news sites, vastly expanding his original reach.
The media needs to take a principled stance and calmly call out his bullshit as bullshit - and we have a responsibility to not amplify it.
Actual matters of state - report on that all you want, as much of a shitshow as it's going to be; but the only way to address his infantile rants is to treat him like an infant.
The answer to your second point is simple.
Meta's properties (FB, Insta) have something that most other social networks are lacking: A network of real-world family and friends.
Twitter, Reddit, Mastodon, Lemmy, Tiktok, and the rest all tend to have communities built from the platform's population, based on shared interests. Meanwhile, FB is the platform that you use to connect with your oddball uncle and high school friends from way back. That's the sunk cost that makes it so much harder to leave than the strangers on reddit who share your love of lime jello.
Net Neutrality was a major principle of the Internet but that is under attack, particularly in the US[...]
Not really focused on the US. Every nation, every corporation, every venal special interest group is fighting against net neutrality.