Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)TH
Posts
20
Comments
2,131
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • I humbly reserve the right to give you a hug, if you'd consent, for all you did for us. Also I would like your permission to kick you in the balls for this "announcement". If your biology doesn't allow for that, don't worry, I've got a magic spell that can give you balls just long enough for me to kick them.

    Just kidding, love you <3

  • (A head-on crash at 60 MPH is like hitting a brick wall at 120 MPH.)

    This is not true at all. The amount of energy is the same as hitting a brick wall at 120 mph, but the energy is spread over both cars. So the end result is actually the same as hitting a brick wall at 60 mph.

    The Mythbusters got this wrong once and were buried with people correcting them, so they tested it and it turned out the viewers were right.

  • First of all, microwaves emit non-ionizing radiation and thus can't affect anything biological except for heating it. Wifi uses the same radiation and we bathe in that all the time, it is totally safe.

    Second of all, even if the microwave blasted huge amounts of ionizing radiation into the underwear or even food when heating, it will NOT turn the food radioactive. This is a common misconception and radiation is often used to treat food in order to kill all the microbes, this makes the food very resistant to spoiling. Often MREs used in the millitary are treated this way to give them a large shelf life, which is a really good feature to have. The food is totally safe to eat (at least from a radiation standpoint).

    It is possible to use radiation to make something radioactive, but the energy levels need to be extremely high. Think inside of nuclear reactors high. This is actually a large reason for radioactive waste, not just the spent fuel, but a lot of parts used inside the reactor become radioactive. This is why nuclear fusion reactors still output a lot of radioactive waste, as parts used inside the reactor (especially the shields) become radioactive.

    However it's important to know radioactivity can absolutely spread and contaminate stuff. This is not because of the radiation, but because of the material itself spreading. It's usually in the form of dust that spreads, gets stuck all over the place and especially when it gets inside of biologics it can be a real problem. But the exact same risk exists for toxic materials that aren't radioactive, for example asbestos fibres.

  • Indeed

    Jump
  • I heard a Brit say the other day it was scorching out. So I asked how hot it was, they said 25 degrees C. I laughed so hard I almost fell from my chair. Where I live it was 33 degrees at that time and had been 39 degrees earlier that week.

  • Since it's blue and around the joints, I'm thinking it's the flux used when these pipes were put in. Most likely with a bit of scrubbing with a metal brush and polish with some steel wool it'll come right off. I doubt it's actually going into the surface.

    But let a professional look at it to be sure.

  • YSK this is actually a bad idea. By repeatedly damaging the skin this way you can actually trigger a nerve condition where the ends of your nerves just send pain signals all the time. People who work in professions where they scrub their hands a lot for their work are at risk of this. It's probably fine to do every once in a while, but don't make it a regular thing.

    The chance is small, but I know a few folk who were real men when they were younger so they didn't wear gloves when they really should have. Just don't worry about it and scrub it off was the mindset back then and men wearing PPE were (and sometime are) seen as weak. But they describe the pain as getting stabbed in the hand repeatedly and wish they just wore the gloves.

  • me_irl

    Jump
  • I got a new mouse for work the other day and was surprised at the packaging. It was super compact and 100% paper. It looked really nice, was super easy to open, did a good job of holding everything and protecting it from impacts. There were no plastic bags inside, the mouse itself was in a velvet like pouch, which was somehow completely made from paper. All of the other stuff was either in little boxes or an envelope.

    It made me happy because the whole thing was pretty much perfect and did it's job as best it could. The thing being so compact made sure it could be shipped in large quantities without taking up any room. It also made me kind of sad of how wasteful those huge plastic boxes were in the past. Turns out with a little bit of effort, we could have done so much better all this time.

  • I have heard Samsung is bad so often on the internet, but my personal experience is different. I've used a Samsung washing machine for almost 10 years now and it still works and looks like the day I bought it. It's very easy to use, has a large front loader door, is quiet and power efficient (as far as that's even possible with a washing machine). Never regretted it.

    My brother also has a Samsung washer and dryer, because he loved how large the door was on my washing machine, so he bought one as well. It has served him fine for about 5 years now.

    But hey, maybe I'm just lucky with the one I've got.

    Before this one I had a Beko washer and dryer. I was unemployed at the time and didn't have a lot of money, so I wanted a cheap model. The salesman in the store said it was bad (this was a long time ago, when they still had salesmen) and would break within a couple of years. But they did upsell an extended warranty for 5 years, which my mom paid for so I could afford to get the washer and dryer. Those units had served me very well for over 15 years. I did have to repair them a couple of times, but nothing major and some normal wear items. I sold those when I bought the Samsung as an upgrade. I switched to natural air drying instead of a dryer for environmental reasons, so I didn't buy a new dryer.

  • When I was a teenager we would regularly go to a smaller local movie theater instead of the more fancy large chains. The vibe was better, but they also had an intermission during the movies and I loved that. During the intermission you could stretch your legs, use the bathroom and get some fresh drinks and snacks. The theater was also really good at scheduling so only one movie had an intermission at one time, so it was pretty quiet at the bathrooms and bar. The intermission was only for 10-15 mins or so. Of course prices back then were normal, so I didn't mind buying more. There also weren't any ads, they just played some music and had an intermission screen up with a countdown.

  • Well that's sort of half right. Yes you can run the smaller models locally, but usually it's the bigger models that we want to use. It would also be very slow on a typical gaming computer and even a high end gaming computer. To make it go faster not only is the hardware used in datacenters more optimised for the task, it's also a lot faster. This is both a speed increase per unit as well as more units being used than you would normally find in a gaming PC.

    Now these things aren't magic, the basic technology is the same, so where does the speed come from? The answer is raw power, these things run insane amounts of power through them, with specialised cooling systems to keep them cool. This comes at the cost of efficiency.

    So whilst running a model is much cheaper compared to training a model, it is far from free. And whilst you can run a smaller model on your home PC, it isn't directly comparable to how it's used in the datacenter. So the use of AI is still very power hungry, even when not counting the training.