Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)WH
Posts
0
Comments
62
Joined
1 mo. ago

  • "Morality is subjective" is the inevitable conclusion of a secular, empiricalistic worldview.

    Essentially, now that we are in a scientific world disagreement is resolved through experiment.

    Disagreement not resolvable through experiment is removed from the realm of science, and is called falsifiable and is seen as subjective.

    If you and I disagree, there are no scientific tests we can run to resolve moral issues.

    And since we can't point to a God or objective moral laws, it doesn't even matter if one theoretically exists because it's inaccessible and infalsifiable. Effectively it doesn't exist for us.

    Both of us are following different moral standards, the "rules" in your head are not the same rules that I'm subjective to.

    You're morals are subjective to your experience, it simply is a fact.

  • Then again, isn't that what people used to do with StackOverflow?

    Yes, one of the major issues with StackOverflow that answerers complained about a lot was the "XY problem.".

    https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/66377/what-is-the-xy-problem

    Where you're trying to do X, but because you're inexperienced you erroneously decide Y must be the solution even though it is a dead end, and then ask people how to do Y instead of X.

    ChatGPT drives that problem up to 11 because it has no problems enabling you to focusing on Y far longer than you should be.