Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)WO
Posts
9
Comments
2,130
Joined
6 mo. ago

  • By Israel's own numbers, Hamas killed two civilians for every military casualty on October 7. This number includes Israeli civilians killed by the IDF to prevent them from becoming hostages. Since the attack, the IDF has killed far far more than two Gazan civilians for every member of Hamas they've taken out. They've leveled Gaza and corralled its population into concentration camps.

    The reason there has been no peace is that Israel doesn't want peace. They are an expansionist state. They continuously expand their borders through the following method:

    1. Have Israeli citizens living right next to Arab populations (Palestinians and others.)
    2. Israel antagonizes their neighbors until some militant group responds violently.
    3. Send in the Israeli military to fight the militant group.
    4. Use fighting the group as cover to expel the Arab population from an area. Justify this by saying a "buffer zone" is required to separate Israelis and Arabs, like the Korean DMZ.
    5. Allow Israeli civilians to settle inside the "buffer zone." Once again have Israelis living right next door to Arabs.
    6. Antagonize their neighbors until violence again erupts.

    This is how Israel slowly expands its borders. And they're not stopping at Gaza and the West Bank. They're doing the same shit in Lebanon and Syria. Arab land today. Buffer zone tomorrow. Israeli cities and towns the day after. It's a slow claiming of Israeli lebensraum one bit at a time, and they've been doing this for decades.

  • Mostly the half dozen posts I've seen on here in the last day or two masturbating to old tired cliches about progressives costing Kamala the election. When, in reality, they held their nose and voted for the corporate goon, like they always do.

  • Yeah the motive is revealed in the methods. Conservatives never propose legislation that specifically addresses any advantage trans women have, instead opting for blanket bans. The science shows that trans women have very little if any advantage in sports, and in my sports we're actually at a competitive disadvantage. Hell, even the chuddiest of chuds could realize that trans women certainly can't have an advantage in all sports. Do trans women have an advantage in women's gymnastics? Have you seen the type of bodies that excel in that sport?

    I would be open to conversations of sports fairness if they came from a place of honest good faith, but they don't. The default stance should be equality first, with restrictions only introduced when absolutely necessary. Is it possible there's some sport that trans women have some massive advantage in? Well trans women should quickly dominate that sport's upper echelons. If you find such a sport, then maybe we can have the conversation about fairness. But even then, it should be limited to just what is absolutely necessary to ensure fairness, nothing more. For example, maybe some handicap system would be appropriate for an individual sport. But even then, such intervention should only be done if there is some enormous unfair advantage that trans women are systematically demonstrating.

    Instead, we just get bigots that talk about a trans girl "stealing" their spot in a sports competition, as if she doesn't have the exact same right to compete as any other girl. It's fundamentally about devaluing the humanity of trans people all together. Trans identities aren't to be respected, they're to be tolerated and humored at best, persecuted at worst. It's no different than the same instincts that kept sports racially segregated for generations.

  • As a trans person, how dare you use my people's name to justify genocide. Most trans people saw right through that shit, as they realized that a party that was willing to sacrifice one minority group on the pyre would be willing to do so to another. And...well..that's exactly what happened. The same corporate Dems that enabled genocide are now tripping over themselves to eagerly join the rollback of the rights of trans people.

  • Jesus fucking Christ.

    Did you just forget the lesson of Nuremberg? You're supposed to punish people who commit crimes against humanity. Doesn't matter what party they belong to. Doesn't matter what other good they might be capable of doing. You must have been a huge fan of Operation Paperclip. After all, we couldn't hang those evil Nazi scientists, we can use their talents!

  • And Kamala losing galvanized that volunteer effort. Mamdani would not have won the primary if Kamala were currently sitting in the White House. Kamala losing did huge damage to the brand of every corporate Democrat. Kamala winning would have showed that that kind of candidate is still viable. Cuomo would have coasted to an easy victory.

  • If you don’t try to change anything, of course the awful “moderates” stay in charge.

    Trying to change thing is exactly what the Uncommitted movement tried to do. And while they failed to move the needle in the 2024 election, in 2028, the Democrats will have to think a lot more about whether they want to keep losing in exchange for supporting genocide.

    Remember, it's always "the most important election ever." Every election is billed as that. But sometimes you need to be willing to accept a short-term loss in exchange for long-term progress. Myopically focusing on just the election right in front of you is how we got into this mess in the first place.

    Kamala losing gave space for someone like Mamdani to win. It's clear that corporate DNC centrism is a toxic losing brand. If Kamala had won, it is extremely unlikely that Mamdani would have won the NYC primary.

  • But they’re not Alligator Auschwitz fucked up.

    Do you have any evidence that the next democratic president will close Trump's new immigration camps? Because they didn't the last time. They kept all of Trump's aggressive immigration programs and even expanded them. If history is any guide, the next democratic president will be just as cruel to immigrants as Trump is now. Biden didn't let up at all from Trump's cruel treatment of immigrants. Democrats just adopted the Republican immigration polices wholesale.

  • If you don't realize MAGA can be blue, then you are likely blue MAGA. At the heart of MAGA is a rejection of reality, a willingness to embrace magical thinking over objective facts, and a loyalty to the party leaders at all cost. Trying to manifest their way to an election victory, gaslighting the electorate by claiming the economy was fine, and lying through their teeth about Biden's condition? That is textbook MAGA behavior. Biden's people might as well have been up there claiming he aced an intelligence exam like Trump's people are always doing.

    Anyone who can't grok the concept of blue MAGA, or think that the blue team is immune to this intellectual sickness...is a fucking moron.

  • Fact: Gazans have just as much right to armed self defense as the Israelis do.

    Fact: Hamas, by Israel's own numbers, does a better job at avoiding civilian casualties than the IDF does.

    Fact: people who hand wring about Hamas are just classists. They view killing someone with a bomb dropped from a plane as morally superior to killing someone with an AK 47. Their moral judgment in the validity of violence is primarily a function of the income of the person committing the violence.