Zeth0s @ Zeth0s @reddthat.com

Posts

0

Comments

51

Joined

2 yr. ago

The fact that it is work that I don't want to do... Pretty much

I read it, and I read the messages from the devs. The communication issue I am trying to point is also highlighted in the comments: if the decision on merging a PR is uniquely dictated by financial benefits of IBM, ignoring the broader benefits of the community, the message is that red hat is looking for free labor and it is not really interested in anything else. Which is absolutely the case, as we all know, but writing it down after the recent events is another PR issue, as red hat justified controversial decisions on the lack of contributions from downstream.

The Italian dev tried to put it down as "we have to follow our service management processes that are messy, tedious and expensive" but he didn't address the problems in the original message. The contributor himself felt like they asked his contribution just to reject it because of purely financial reasons without any additional details. It is a new PR incident

No need to be sorry, thanks for the clarification ;)

The Apparently is already patch on fedora... Just reporting other comments in this thread. But why do they accept contribution to centos of they don't want patches that are not economically beneficial to the company? It is a pretty bad message written as this

I stopped recommending it. It is a pity, but there are alternatives

Why would they accept PR at all if they don't have a robust testing process and approvals are dictated by customers needs?

The message as it is now to potential contributors is that their contribution in not welcome, unless its free labor to financially benefit only ibm.

Which is fair, but the message itself is a new PR issue for red hat

Have many reddit devs left?

I blocked meme, 196 and shitposting. All is clean now

This is exactly the issue, shorter wave lengths can carry more data, but they are blocked by literally everything between the source and the antenna... Longer wave lengths carry less information, but at least they are more reliable and can pass through many obstacles. It's a compromised at the end

The problem of current LLM implementations is that they learn from scratch, like taking a baby to a library and telling him "learn, I'll wait out in the cafeteria".

You need a lot of data to do so, just to learn how to write, gramma, styles, concepts, relationships without any guidance.

This strategy might change in the future, but the only solution we have now is to refine the model afterward, let's say.

Tbf biases are integral part of literature and human artistic production. Eliminating biases means having "boring" texts. Which is fine for me, but a lot of people will complain that AI is dumb and boring

Yeah, first thing I noticed as well. Hilarious how the guy has no idea what he is talking about

But it is for wifi communication apparently. Unfortunately short wave lengths are absorbed more easily than longer wave lengths as the current radio/microwave solutions. That is the main physical limitations to overcome

Catholic Church nowadays is actually already ready to incorporate extraterrestrial life in their preaching. There is a whole astronomical "research" center in Vatican dedicated to align scientific theories such as big bang within catholic preaching.

This is part of it https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vatican_Observatory

I am more for going on with donations, with some kind of useless leader board for volunteering activities, to introduce some kind of "safe" and fun gamification.

I have no idea what this could be, I am not very good in creating games

Same experience. It is also increasingly ignoring instructions, always ends up with similar answers whatever the request is formulated. It's a pity

Unfortunately that is not the case. Closed sourced software for small communities are not safer. My company had an incredibly embarrassing data leak because they outsourced some work and trusted a software used also by the competitors. Unfortunately the issue was found by one of our customers and ended up on the newspapers.

Absolutely deserved, but still, closed sourced stuff is not more secure

I used mainly for programming support, brainstorming on techs and libraries, and to refine technical documentation. But support for programming is becoming a bit of a pain honestly...

Thanks! I tried vicuna, but I didn't find it very good for programming. I will keep searching :)

What local models are you using that are better? Not trying to argue, honest interest

I find that recently the effort needed to get the "right" answer is much more than in the past for gpt-4. That's my impression. At the end I am finding myself more often going back to google, stack overflow, manuals, medium...

I believe they distilled the model to much for performances, or the rlhf is really degrading the model performances