andsens @ andsens @lemmy.world Posts 0Comments 4Joined 2 wk. ago
The Gold standard couldn't be sustained. Basically, the U.S. was no longer just exporting shittons of product and making a killing, it was now also importing a lot. The shift of that balance meant that keeping the ratio of 35 dollars per troy ounce of gold was nigh impossible.
I understand and sympathize with where your coming from. I don't have all the counter arguments, but one that stuck with me while I was devils advocating it with two of my friends stuck with me. (Mind you, I'm drunk on a Friday night at 3 AM, so just posting this before I forget to do it tomorrow).
One of your arguments (not all!) is built on an opposing side abusing the cultural impact of CRT/DEI. However, that can be applied as a premise to a slew of other political efforts with the same mechanics where the singling out of a group can be twisted into discrimination of an adjacent group:
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Permanent Fund Dividend (PFD) for Alaskans
- Shelters and Services Program for Immigrants
- Any policies surrounding Native Americans
In all the above programs, one could make the case that there are adjacent groups that do not, but maybe should, receive those benefits. CRT/DEI just is an easier target to gather people around. It doesn't exist in a vacuum, it's just the most prominent and easily targetable policy.
All that doesn't invalidate CRT/DEI or any of the other policies, and even with political opposition one could still argue for their benefit. So, my point is this: Bad actors abusing and misrepresenting a program that focuses on specific groups is not an argument against that policy. If it didn't exist, they'd latch on to something else. So you're letting a policy be ruined, not based on its merits, but on how others can twist a narrative around it.
Again, you have made other points that I'm not addressing at all in this argument. I'll let others argue against those.
A Coup Is In Progress In America
After the USAID thing I called it this morning: Before the end of march the U.S. is a dictatorship in all but name.
To pull this off things have to happen fast, denying anybody the time to react.
USAID was a probing attack, gauge the reactions, develop plans, figure out how to do it better with the next department. You don't start with Homeland Security, the CIA, or the FBI - that's the final part.
Meanwhile, keep everybody busy with 50 different crazy things so they can't organize a concerted effort to resist.
That being said, I'm only half-sold on Greenland and the Panama Canal being a distraction. Once you have complete control you're at the whim of Denmark not revoking access to Thule and Panama not denying passage. Might be both, confuse and prepare.