Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)AN
Posts
7
Comments
757
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Why would we need to store energy for more than an day? We only need to smooth out the difference between supply and demand.
    The mayor advantage of the European grid is the disconnectedness over long distances. There are always enough places where the sun shines or the wind blows.

  • I am not arguing that nuclear should have been phased when it was, as that resulted in more coal and gas, but that clinging to it now is a mistake.
    Building a new nuclear power plant in Germany would take a decade if things went well. Until then grid battery storage can mature and demand adjustment projects can be rolled out. It's probably also easier to convince germans to accept pumped hydro where they live over nuclear.

  • After some bureaucratic steps, it gets to the european commission and parliament, which will discuss it and write a response.
    If the commission feels like it, it will make a law for the parliament to vote on.

  • It is also massively uneconomical. Even with existing subsidies, like free insurance and long term storage, plant operators don't want to keep going.

    Modern day nuclear advocates are like the Japanese soldiers in the 70s refusing to admit the war was lost decades ago.

  • The only reason "civilian" nuclear power exists is as a fig leaf for nuclear armament.

    I don't think post war Germany had the delusion of their own nukes. Here the nuclear industry just exists to shuffle public money into private pockets.

  • Great quiz. It teaches you the rules while training you to expect the unexpected, even in the rare cases that the rules are applied consistently.
    I got exactly half the questions right.

  • You call things the way they were defined. Problem solved.

    What?

    I’m kinda confused, because this is the second time now where your attempt at making a counter argument is actively supporting my point. Is this intentional at your part?

    We are ultimately arguing about subjective preferences. I favor of certain syntactic sugar because I believe it improves readability while you seem to be arguing for strict consistency above all else.
    So by what metric are we measuring our points?

    No we don’t. If your point relies on Turing-tarpitting the whole discussion … then you have no point.

    I admit, that was hyperbolic, but I don't see what syntax for data manipulation other than functions would be left in your ideal language.

  • Sticker @feddit.org

    🟤🠲🟢

    196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    💕 got new rules 💕

    NonCredibleDiplomacy @sh.itjust.works

    If you thought missiles were disruptive to trade, wait til you see what policy can do

    ich_iel @feddit.org

    ich📜iel

    Boost For Lemmy @lemmy.world

    Add to the list of instances opened in app

    AutoTL;DR support @lemmings.world

    The bot got stuck on a newsletter sign up form.