Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)AP
Posts
2
Comments
109
Joined
1 mo. ago

  • I agree. I still think regular peiple would view that as "the government stealing their property" though. For example i know a few people who buy places and fix them up to rent out. Are you saying they should get their properties taken away?

    If you're only referring to billionaires and corporations buying housing, i agree. But if any laws were put into place, we know how it always goes, it would only affect those regular Joe's renting properties, and theyd further hate the government for too much regulation. I see no way to possibly stop the rich from buying all housing.

  • Maybe this is a good place to ask this, as I always think about it. I am all in favor of abolishing this nightmare of late stage capitalism and coporate ownership of government. However, how do you explain that any other form wont take away from those of us who are (admittedly lucky) home/land owners, that actually are sitting fine ? Those people don't want to give up what they have so someone in an apartment can have more. Think of it this way: you have an acre of land you worked for, it wasn't given. Someone else has a 2 bedroom apartment they also worked for. For reason (either laziness, or unfortunately events) the apartment owner can't save enough for a house/land. Maybe their mental capability is maxed out (be honest, we know people like this) and they can't get more schooling etc. Under a socialist system, it seems like anyone with their house/land would be forced to give it up and live in blocs of apartments, which no one I know actually wants. This is just one example. But it's something that I feel like will always hold the US back from socialism, because those that currently have "the dream" don't want it to be taken. Now, people living in shacks that vote for Musk because the immigrants will take their jerbs, those people are idiots. But I'm talking about people who work full time and are decently well off, probably have a decent amount in stocks etc. Those people don't want corporations destroying us, but they also don't want full socialism.

  • You're forgetting one thing. All those details you mentioned, 99.8% of all humanity does not care or notice any of that. They will listen to AI trash and like it just the same. Also, show me one actually new thing that's been done with synthesizers that I haven't heard before, I'd be surprised if you could. I'm just saying, nothing is original. When recorded music first existed in the later 1800s, it was actually new. I'm not arguing nothing is good anymore, I'm saying nothing is new. There's a difference.

  • Everyone has opinions but mint has been the most stable for me. Plus large user base. It doesn't come with everything built in like bazzite, but it's so easy to install wine, steam, proton, etc anyway.

  • It doesn't really have anything to do with old music being better, it's not, I'm just saying with a new song released every minute and billions of people on earth, there is nothing new. Everything sounds like something else, it's inevitable.

  • Linux Gaming @lemmy.world

    Alright, who has the best info for using racing wheels on linux?

    Linux Gaming @lemmy.world

    Could I theoretically keep gaming on windows 10, while doing any other work (banking etc) on linux?