Back at you, terrorism apologist
I don't know you, but you seem to resort to ad-hominem attacks.
Why don't you engage with evidence instead of staying in your echo chamber.
Keeping your eyes and ears shut while looking at evidence is a is a guaranteed way to keep thinking whatever your thinking now.
You don't need to look far for evidence
https://palwatch.org/page/8418
You can scream genocide as long as you want, this ain't it.
They mostly keep them indoctrinated for Jihad. https://palwatch.org/page/8418
If Israel's mission was to kill all of them that would have already been done.
You mean that after a decades of educating for violence it's only likely they'll join the fight themselves, right?
At this point it's clear that UNWRA is one of the main causes of the prolonging of this conflict, so I hope they do shut down.
You seem like someone who believes anything that enforces his current beliefs, while ignoring anything that opposes it.
https://armenpress.am/en/article/1198626
The Guardian is an untrustworthy biased POS.
The convoy was being used to transport Hamas militants, masquerading as humanitarian aid workers (a war crime fyi). The attack targeted (and struck) only the militants.
Claiming this was an attack on a humanitarian convoy and that some random people were hit is highly misleading
Wow, most misleading title ever.
I read the headline and straight away thought about UNWRA, a second later I saw what site it was.
There are humanitarian zones for the civilians with more than enough water.
The situation there is shitty, but to the blame of all the suffering on Israel alone is just plain wrong.
You should ask Hamas why they are stealing the Palestinian people's aid to fight their illegal war
How did you reach this conclusion? Did I say that? Don't put words in my mouth.
You know shit, stop getting headlines from your echo chamber and read something you didn't already decided to agree with before reading for a change
https://honestreporting.com/debunked-those-maps-of-palestinian-land-loss-are-misleading-heres-why/
So, if a small group of terrorists decides to operate out of a civilian population to attack a sovereign nation they automatically get immunity for their action and get a free "get out of jail" card? By your logic everytime some niche group decides they don't get what they want (however absurd their demands are), all they have to do is arm themselves and operate from within a civilian population to automatically get support for their efforts, right?
Arab people aren't real people? Tell that to the 20% Arab civilans in Israel. You obviously know shit about this conflict.
Completely ignoring the hostages? Well ok then.
That justifies war, yes.
War sucks and people get killed. Now grow up.
Jordan's Abdullah at White House: October 7 attacks cannot be accepted by any Muslim * Restoration work starts at Kibbutz Be'eri * US urges probe into killing of 6-year-old in Gaza
Extraction is only second successful rescue since Oct. 7 * IDF conducts intensive strikes on Rafah targets; Hamas: Over 50 killed
Extraction is only second successful rescue since Oct. 7 * IDF conducts intensive strikes on Rafah targets; Hamas: Over 50 killed
I saw this post on x-twitter that explains this phenomenon which I really relate to:
>ADHD and other auditory processing challenged brains will have a delayed ability to process auditory inputs. > >But the brain has a pretty nifty feature that stores up to 2 seconds of auditory information... it's called the "phonological loop" > >So, when a brain that struggles to process auditory info takes that info in... even though there's a delay in processing what that info means... it stays accessible for a short time to be processed when the brain is ready. > >Cool, no?