Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)OK
Posts
2
Comments
657
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • In the trolley problem, is it "wrong" to divert the train from many to one? Given the immediate effect that killing has had, I don't think it is unreasonable think that taking that one life has (stochastically) saved at least a two digit number of other lives.

  • I have never seen a clearer divide and correlation between the value I observe being produced, and those that don't understand the limitations and value of LLMs.

    It's exhausting, because, yes, LLMs are extremely valuables, but only as so far as to solve the problem of "possible suggestions", and never as "answers and facts". For some reason, and I suppose it's the same as for why bullshit is a thing, people conflate the two. And, not just any "people" either, but IT developers and IT product managers, all the way up. The ones that have every reason to know better, are the ones that seem to be utterly clueless as to what problems it solves well, what is irresponsible for it do be used for, correctly evaluating ethics, privacy and security, etc. Sometimes I feel like I'm in a mad house or just haven't found the same hallucinogenic that everyone else is on.

  • These articles just stink corporate interests. "You'd have to pay 20% more than a competitor, if the difference is requiring not working from home." rings a lot different than "please master, don't make me go back, I'll work for 20% less and be happy, it's a win-win, right?"

    Let's see how competitive the company is when you are off by at least 20% and the ones who work from home at the competing firms are more productive at it too.

  • The argument is that the explanation was valid, and whether or not you found it valid, is more to do with your inability to get it. Now, this isn't saying anything about you, because you might get it. So, the "you", is not the particular you, but rather "one such that would meet the requirement". But hey, you do you.

  • Party pooper here.

    You know when fast food workers post images of things like stepping bare footed onto a bowl of salad?

    To me, this is the equivalent for pilots. Safety, checklists and routines, take time. Don't go posting on social media that your are competing in this space.

    Ps: the post in question is arguably not too bad. But, if this is "a thing", then I'd suggest to be careful to be associated with it.