I felt that being like 15 years old, then got excited over one girl (that worked as a temporary solution), then she ditched me, so I have a good fat trauma to return to if bored.
At which point exactly? Seems a rather fat one, spanning over 20 years.
I'm confident ChatGPT is sufficient to replace Slutsky.
Apparently the percentage of people actually understanding what they are doing in the management part of the industry is now too low to filter out even such bullshit.
Apple and MS are playing "good cop, bad cop" with them and they are happy. What can you do.
I don't remember anything ever in history undermining faith in the free - from regulation, but not from jailing crooks, - market.
It's not as if anything lefties claim to be that were free. And when one talks about what is needed to make it free, one can hear screeching of the "reeeeeee useful idiots for capitalism reeeeee you just want poor people to die reeeeee we should all vote for 8 hour work week and peace on Earth reeeeee what do you mean it's not enough to vote reeeee" kind.
Even Ponzi schemes are usually about everyone being conscious it's a scheme, but thinking they are very smart and will fool some other suckers, and those suckers think the same in turn. That is covered by the "jailing crooks" part.
And various cartels and trusts and such usually make government regulation their instrument. They benefit from it.
I mean, all this has been said and proven many times.
No. They are still capable of pressure typical for oligopoly (censoring out mentions of their competition, tactically buying out things which could help that competition and shutting them down, defamation, lobbying for laws directed against their competition).
Unless that happens too fast for them to realize.
especially considering eugene has no love for the kgb.
That may be a weird way to say he has lots of love for SVR (external intelligence service) or police K department, but not FSB.
Like that conversation in the "Sneakers" movie about FBI, CIA and NSA.
There should also be limitations on the content of bills, so fewer omnibis bills and more smaller bills (one idea is to force legislators to swear under oath that they understand the bill). That should allow popular legislation to make it through easier.
That is the hardest problem to solve fundamentally IMHO. The package bills.
Which is why some people give up (or lose their mind) and become 'sovereign citizens" or ancaps.
Well, maybe it's good they'll die finally.
I think that’s the appropriate scope as well, I’m just sad that we’ve let the laws get away from us.
I don't.
You are right in the sense that it all comes down to the society having such laws or not having them (as in rioting till something changes?).
But in the sense of forces nudging these laws in one or another direction, anything that causes a constant one-sided drift when left to usual laws should be moved to constitutional ones.
Not sure if that's very correct. I'd say it's not about skills, but about such actions still generally not being prosecuted in Russia.
Of course there's also the issue of low-level reverse engineering skills, which may have been prestigious for longer in Russia due to level of life (old hardware being used longer, at some point with DOS), hacker movies cargo cult combined with Russians feeling the social need to present themselves smarter than they are (for example, all those award papers for stupid competitions in school where children who've had in their life an hour-long explanation of, for example, combinatorics or basic discrete math win, and those who haven't lose or don't get there).
Copyright should be nullified if there’s no longer first party sales.
Then everything created before now will compete with new copyrighted creations.
In a lobbied environment such a thing can't exist.
Probably some elaborations about what exclusive rights can and can't be should have been put into US constitution (because US is the main source of this particular problem, though, of course, it'll be defended by interested parties in many other countries), but that was written a bit earlier than even electric telegraphy became a thing.
They really couldn't imagine trying to destroy\outlaw earlier better creations so that the garbage wouldn't have competition. Printing industry back then did, of course, have weight in making laws, but not such an unbalanced one, because the middle class of that time wouldn't consume as easily as in ours (one could visually differentiate members of that by normal shoes and clothes), and books were physical objects.
Why does desktop hardware become more and more complex and fragile?
I want my BunkerNet with 90s Amiga level machines with technology practical enough to be produced (with reasonable investment) at least in every 1mln city (with literate population and necessary raw resources available).
Yes, I've even started with something above that, running Windows 98SE, games and all.
But just ... how necessary it really is? Just (that is, 1.5 hrs ago, ADHD) returned home from a bicycle ride in a park, it's fun with a normal bicycle, it's fun with a Soviet bicycle which is barely that, it's fun with a foldable bicycle with switchable reductors, it's fun with roller skates, and it's fun on foot.
Can we treat computers the same? They are means to an end. NEW ROUNDED CORNERS AND ADS IN EVERY ORIFICE TO BE ALWAYS CONNECTED TO OUR NEW ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE is not that end.
EDIT: ok, each 1mln city is asinine ; each 5-10mln people on the planet maybe?
Well, in those memories you wouldn't have to go to any market, you'd just see a few tables along the way in busy places on your way anywhere. Maybe even smaller shops (usually illegal construction alongside bigger buildings or even just in the middle of something supposed to be a square).
BTW, about illegal construction - frankly I'm nostalgic of all that. Because yeah, those cheap plastic things were illegal and were all demolished. Instead we now have supposedly legal heavy, tasteless, threatening "shopping centers" here and there, miraculously making the space feel more constrained than those old things would, all belonging to the right people, with nice shiny perfectly legal businesses inside.
It's somehow relaxing to get someplace backwater sometimes and see towns looking that old way. Though the town I'm thinking about looked differently back then, and I liked it more, but what will you do.
A-and frankly there were plenty of situations where it was perfectly legal (as possible in the Russian 90s), but "the permit was issued by mistake, no compensation is in order, free the building for demolition by tomorrow" for a 20 years old building solves any problem.
By the way, how is apple intelligence different from potato intelligence?
I said you’re a fucking idiot.
And I didn't say you are a fucking idiot, but this is a clear case of projection.
I remember you coming at me with similarly buttfuck dumb opinions on Unix.
So now I'm saying that you are a fucking idiot, ignorant and arrogant at that.
Now stop talking, please.
That won't go unnoticed forever, I think.
russia has been the #1 source of firmware jailbreaks and torrents for industrial software for 20+ years. Their government is so awful that their people had to figure out how to work around the world hating them.
These two sentences are unconnected. It's just that in the 90s and early 00s in Russia incomes were still not very high to buy software, copyright protection wasn't really enforced, copyright violation being a thing was hard to explain to many people, and lots of things wouldn't be officially sold. Say, localized versions of video games often wouldn't exist.
In my childhood I remember that pirate disks were norm and official ones a curiosity, something very cool and unusual. Then official versions (including localized ones from 1C) started becoming more common, as would buying disks in book stores etc, and not in underground crossings or near subway entrances.
There were even companies which technically sold pirate disks, but they could have become official localizers or vendors or whatever. It probably didn't even occur to them to try and become such.