Yea this is common knowledge, why is this being posted?
Then decree one
I can't tell if this is real or not
... This time?
Kinda meh examples but fantastic concept
What a cute family photo
If you can win in a fight you didn't start, whether that's verbal or physical win it, otherwise walk away without a bit of acknowledgement.
That's even more complicated than half the stuff normal users on Linux do
Whoopsie my bad guys
The image attached makes this the fakest story I've ever seen on greentext
Let me guess, bungie also blocked this from being used on the steam deck
In games like Destiny or CS:GO for example, you should not even be allowed to start the activity without a working microphone. I dont care if you are antisocial, if that's the case, those activaties aren't for you and you shouldn't bring down your entire team because of that.
As an clarification, I'm more worried about Raids than PVP
I know I will, but it also leaves an edited mark on the comments so I'm curious about your thoughts
I was trying to post a video but it wouldn't show up as available to upload in Jerboa, is this a per community thing or is it across all of lemmy? It would make sense because videos are inherently a larger file size, if that is the reason
Something on the lines of if your company facility is using over X amount of energy the majority of that has to be from a green source such as solar power. What would happen and is this feasible or am I totally thinking about this wrong
Edit: Good responses from everyone, my point in asking this was completely hypothetical, ignoring how hard it would be to implement a restriction. My own thoughts are that requiring the use of renewable energy for high electricity products could help spur the demand for it as now it's a requirement. Of course companies would fight back, they want money
For example, theming shouldnt have to be a 10 step process. Make Flatpaks use your themes correctly. Another thing is QT Theming, why is it outside of KDE you can't use the breeze style? It's the best and most consistent application style for QT apps. And the final point, when is the naming scheme of org.foo.bar going to be fixed to be the actual name of the package rather than the technical name. Flatpak remove and flatpak install both work without giving the full name, so why doesn't flatpak run? The naming is the only thing snaps have over flatpak. If nothing is been done how can I contribute?
"I'm not going to stand here and listen to you badmouth the greatest democracy the world has ever known." - J.C. Denton, Deus Ex