Created a new community, !aom@lemm.ee, for the newly-released Age of Mythology game
Created a new community, !aom@lemm.ee, for the newly-released Age of Mythology game
Created this account so I could create the community. Decided on lemm.ee because my main account is on aussie.zone, which does not allow community creation (and limits its communities to things about Australia). Figured lemm.ee is better than lemmy.world due to the latter's performance/federation issues.
You're viewing part of a thread.
What current job?
I started Communick as a side-project in the end of 2019, but in July of last year I lost my job and decided to make this really work.
Now I get more why you are pushing so hard to make it profitable.
Have you considered finding another job in the meantime? The Fediverse isn't going to be profitable any time soon
Have you considered finding another job in the meantime?
What makes you think I am not looking?
Good luck on your search then!
Why not "good luck on making Communick work"?
Because the chances of this actually happening are quite slim.
It would be nice the Fediverse became profitable, and if Communick could become your main source of income, but from every signal we can see, it is not going to happen anytime soon.
10-15k customers to pay me $30/year
That's like a third of the current Lemmy userbase, who would be using exclusively your instances. Probably not realistic in the near future.
This is not just over the Lemmy userbase.
- It's the million+ people using Mastodon, Misskey, Pixelfed, etc.
- It's the million+ people that still pay for Reddit Gold, and could be paying a fraction of that and still have a good experience on the Fediverse.
- It's the millions of people that were on Twitter and now are (likely) going to end up on Bluesky
- It's the millions of people that pay $10/month for Spotify but could be well served by a Funkwhale instance
- It's every writer that is on Substack but could be making a living with subscription-based access like https://sub.club or the payment gateway features from https://mitra.social
When I am dreaming of 10-15k users, I am looking at all the potential userbase, not the existing one.
Honestly, what bothers me a bit is you saying "It would be nice the Fediverse became profitable", but from all our interactions you seem to only support efforts that do not require any material (i.e, financial contribution) from you, and you have been purposefully avoiding contributing to the topic-based instances that I have set up.
I'll tell you one thing, I am thinking about giving away all the topic-based instances to the collective behind feddit.org. If I do that, would you move away your communities there?
you seem to only support efforts that do not require any material (i.e, financial contribution) from you,
Nice to see that you consider that my time is worthless. Or is other people's time only valuable when they are admins?
I’ll tell you one thing, I am thinking about giving away all the topic-based instances to the collective behind feddit.org. If I do that, would you move away your communities there?
What do you mean by this? How would this work? How would pay the costs and spend time managing all of these topic specific instances?
Not going to comment on your first paragraph, as you seem convinced this userbase is there and ready to use your services.
I didn't say your time is worthless. I am actually impressed with how much you've done here. What I am saying is that you only support things with your time, and you refused to help whenever money was involved. Is that not accurate?
pay the costs and spend time managing all of these topic specific instances?
So you acknowledge that running instances do have costs that need to be covered somehow. That's already a good thing.
Anyway, to make the case here: I am willing to move ownership of the instances to feddit.org's OpenCollective and even keep managing it, as long as there is understanding that they should be topic specific and closed for registrations. The idea would be to have feddit.org as the instance for people, and the topic instances as home for groups.
If that were to happen, would you move your communities there?
as you seem convinced this userbase is there and ready to use your services
No, I am convinced of its potential. There is a difference.
What I am saying is that you only support things with your time, and you refused to help whenever money was involved. Is that not accurate?
I support my main instance enough to cover the costs: based on the other thread I opened, and having a look at sopuli's FAQ, https://sopuli.xyz/post/13531 it costs them 0,06€ per user per month, so 0,72€ per year.
I don't know why you keep bringing this up, or maybe you meant that one time I refused to get a communick subscription?
Based on that other thread, some instances have costs as low as 0,10$ per user per month, so 1,2$ per year.
I just checked the Communick prices again, indeed it's 30$ per year, which is 25 times more expensive than the cost above.
If that were to happen, would you move your communities there?
Why would I? You have been always been claiming that if something would happen to you, someone else would take over, but we still only see you talking about Communick.
Managing an instance takes time and requires a team to be done properly. You are suggesting to add a number of instances on a single team. Have you ever asked them if they would be okay with this?
We have discussed this in the past already: I'm always reluctant to use your instances as you are the single point of failure of the whole Communick projects.
If lemm.ee goes down tomorrow, that would be a good news but Lemmy as a whole would recover. If lemm.ee, lemmy.ca, sh.itjust.works, Lemmy.dbzer0, feddit.org and discuss.tchncs.de would go down together tomorrow, that might probably kill the platform.
Having a set of predominant content instances managed by the same person (or team, if you get feddit.org's approval), wouldn't be that much different from having Lemmy.world dominating Lemmy as they are now.
Let instances develop organically. Let them be managed by different teams, with different people, different approaches. Let people use the software rather than trying to centralize its control.
Ok, so let's make it clear that the whole talk about "it would be nice to make it profitable" is not serious, and also make it clear that your idea of "supporting the instances" is just equivalent to cover the hardware costs, which is a rounding error compared to the cost of human labor involved.
There is just so much more going on that you are taking for granted, I don't even know where to start:
- Developers of the leading projects
- Developers of ancillary projects (fediseer, CSAM detection, alternative frontends, etc...)
- The labor of instance admins
- The labor of moderators
By saying that you are covering the cost of the hardware, you are basically saying that the work of everyone else is worth zero. This is downright offensive.
maybe you meant that one time I refused to get a communick subscription?
No, not really. At the moment I am more upset about the fact that you are one of the most active users here, that you jump instances every two weeks or so and yet you seem to think that contributing $1/year is "enough" to support the work of everyone involved here.
Imagine going to a farmer's market and saying "how come do you sell those eggs for 10€ a dozen, you can feed 25 chickens for a whole month with that, if they lay 1 egg per day you are getting 750 eggs, so I don't see why I should give more than 12/750 euros per egg." and tell me how well that's going to go.
I just checked the Communick prices again, indeed it’s 30$ per year, which is 25 times more expensive than the cost above.
First, the $29/year includes access to Mastodon, Matrix, Lemmy and Funkwhale, with 250GB of space. There is also a 20% pledge of profits to go to the underlying projects. I also need to pay for things that others might be skipping on, like backups, redundant servers, etc.
Second and most important: the $29/year is supposed to buy you peace of mind. My customers are not paying me to "share the costs". They are paying me so they can feel assured that there is one professional taking care of the infrastructure. They are paying me to ensure that I can worry about the bugs in the software instead of them. They are paying me so that they don't have to worry about the instance going under without notice. They are paying me because they know that these things do not come for free.
Managing an instance takes time and requires a team to be done properly. You are suggesting to add a number of instances on a single team.
No, I'm not. I'm saying that I can still manage it if needed. My proposal would be to donate the instances to the team to get rid of this "single point of failure" that you are holding me against.
Have you ever asked them if they would be okay with this?
This is (so far) just a thought experiment, which I am making to illustrate how your logic is flawed. You are saying that my work is not worth the price that I am charging, yet at the same time you think that others will not be interested in doing because it takes time and expertise. Don't you see the contradiction here?
Let instances develop organically. Let them be managed by different teams, with different people, different approaches.
That's very eloquent, but you are still evading the most fundamental issue: If your idea of "growing the network" is to keep waiting to get more enthusiasts who are willing to sacrifice their time and sanity to serve 1-2 thousand users at a time, you are going to wait for a very. long. time. If everyone keeps treating this as a mere hobby, and if users keep thinking like you and refuse to pay for the professionals what they are worth, then the professionals are simply going to go work somewhere else. If you don't believe me, just look at what is happening with Mastodon and Bluesky.