Funny how those who don't want to be part of society still want all the protections and infrastructure provided by society.
They never think about the money they use, shops they visit, the roads they drive on, the clean water they drink, the power they use, the food they access, the regulations and laws keeping them from being forced into slavery or poisoned or killed by their neighbour who wants their stuff, the access to health services, firefighters, police... They somehow never think about what society gives them only what they can take without having to give back.
I think we should let them be free of society, the historical term for that is outlaw, you're free to be free from society, come back and you get shot.
And your argument about authoritarianism is just stupid, socially agreed upon authority is a necessity for maintaining any set of rules.
I swear you spend hours upon hours just being wrong on the Internet on purpose.
I don't know what that has to do with the topic. Unless you're implying that people consent to living in a state of starvation, homelessness, exploitation, etc, and that's why "democracy" has not fixed these problems.
Which question? How does that relate to the thread? You're just jumping around spewing nonsense and trying to change the subject all the time. Good job!
I very clearly asked you what you think democracy is and you went on some irrelevant spiel about authoritarian regimes. I still don't know what you think democracy is. I don't know how you could get confused over such a simple question but I hope you work out your issues.
No, you very clearly changed the subject multiple times and ignored my answers. I mean, if you have nothing to say, then it's better to keep shut. People might think you're actually smart.