Palworld ditches Pokéball-style summoning mechanic amid Nintendo legal battle
Palworld developer Pocket Pair has released an update for the creature-catching survival game removing the ability to s…
I did read the article and I do know why the lawsuit is happening, at least what's been reported, as I've read a few articles about it. I'm not hiding behind anything, and people are free to disagree with me.
A reminder that all I said at first was that I was surprised to find out just how much they were ripping off Pokémon, and what I was referring to (but not clearly) were in many of the designs and the brazen pokeballs. I didn't comment on the lawsuit at all, at first.
I really hope you're lying because if you do know what this is about, then that just makes all of your comments worse. Also, you're calling people who disagree with you a hivemind, so don't try to pretend you're fine with it.
You said that, in this case, you were in favor of a big company bullying a little one with the law because they ripped off pokemon designs, which isn't even a topic that is being discussed here. If anyone needs a reminder of what you commented, it's you.
No, I called people who saw downvotes and piled on to the downvotes a hive mind. Please do not put words in my mouth.
Have a nice day.
Nobody saw downvotes and piled on, people saw a dumb comment and downvoted it. Regardless of what you decide to tell yourself.
I just want you to know that I saw your comment, said "oh, that's off topic and an overall bad take", and then downvoted. That's when I noticed your score was negative and not positive. I'm not part of a hive mind, friend. You just had/have a bad take imo.
If you really downvoted because you thought it was off topic then I think you used the button correctly, but in that case I'd just disagree with what is off topic. A thread about pokemon and palworld and I'm commenting comparing the two doesn't feel like a stretch to me but, eh.
Doesn't change my opinion about people downvoting though. My experience overall has been very similar to reddit, which makes sense considering the huge migration from there to here.
Now we're pretty far off topic though, so have a nice day.
It wasn't terribly off topic, no. But the "design similarities" point is pretty weak and not related to the matters at large. To address it though, I fundamentally disagree that ip theft or patent theft or anything else we can boil down to "OC donut steel" is a serious issue. Creativity is iterative, nothing is original, and pretending otherwise is silly. We make a big deal of these things because money is involved, but that doesn't compel my opinions whatsoever. Stickman drawings have been copied since humans could draw, and we've been iterating on them ever since. If someone claims to own the Stickman design, they're a dumbass. Incidentally, that's what happened with Nintendo claiming they own the concept of throwing a thing that summons another thing. The whole ordeal is ridiculous and only serves to stifle creative endeavors for monetary security.
I'm sure you've already heard these things and chosen to ignore them. That's your prerogative. I downvoted you because I think you're wrong and making a bad point. That's mine. Others feel the same way. People agreeing with the sentiment doesn't make them a hive mind. It means they've made similar observations about the same phenomenon. You're dehumanizing people by calling them a hive mind because they disagree with you. I'm calling you wrong because I think your opinion is wrong. You are allowed to be wrong, though. Your opinion is still perfectly valid and agreeable to many, many people. They are not a hive mind, but they are likeminded with you. That's okay. I encourage you to continue to voice your opinions despite opposition because I sincerely think that's a good thing for you to do. But try to remember that every single one of us (sans any possible bots) is actually a whole human with their own mind and reasons for doing what they do, even if you don't like them for doing it.
