You're viewing part of a thread.
Lol. How about this experiment. You produce something nobody buys and see how long it lasts. Remind me in, idgaf, you're a troll.
1 0 Replycalling me names won't change the truth.
1 0 ReplyThe truth is whatever you believe regardless of evidence, clearly.
3 0 Replythe truth is independent of what anyone believes, but evidence would help point us to truth, if you could come up with some.
1 1 Reply
such an experiment would have no bearing on a separate product in a separate market.
1 1 ReplyProduce milk then, I'll wait.
2 0 Replyothers already do that. no need for me to undertaking such an endeavor. the problem is that we don't have a method to reduce demand. you haven't even produced a method to measure demand.
1 1 ReplyYou have changed the argument from: demand decreasing does not reduce supply. To: we can't reduce demand. Do you see the flaws in your argument yet?
2 0 Replyyou haven't provided a method to test your hypothesis.
1 0 Replydemand decreasing doesn't cause a reduced supply.
1 0 ReplyEvidence? Assertion without requires no evidence to refute.
I'm not going to believe that commies are inherently dumb no matter how hard you try.
1 0 Replyone easy way to gauge demand would be price.
the price of Faberge eggs varies, but even when it increases, indicating an increase in demand, no more are produced. and by contrast upon a price decrease, no causal mechanism reduces the supply. qed.
2 1 ReplySo, where are the warehouses full of unsold eggs that are constantly filling up waiting for your point to land?
1 0 ReplyI just showed that supply is not dependent on demand.
1 0 ReplyYou did not. But thanks for playing.
1 0 Reply
I'm not constructing an argument
I'm deconstructing one.
1 3 ReplyYou think you are, but this is not new territory and you are not that interesting.
1 0 ReplyI anyone can see exactly what happened in this thread, and if you're disinterested, you needn't reply.
1 1 Reply