Forbes paints a different picture if you simply take the average across the available generations (which is what I did) and I have the impression they would be far more accurate.
Yes. Averages do paint different pictures than actual hard numbers. And yet the actual hard numbers show the reality of the situation, and that reality is that a lot less than 56% Americans have more than $5000 in savings because that has nothing to do with an average.
Breaking it down by generations still does not change the fact that a lot less than 56% of Americans have more than $5000 in their savings accounts. Maybe more of certain generations do, but that's not what you said.
It doesn't matter what is being averaged. When you are talking about what percentage of Americans have something, it's about hard numbers, not averages. Insulting me won't change that, but if you insist on continuing to do so, I'll just report you for violating the rules and move on.
I’m talking about getting the average from savings brackets across multiple demographics.
Again this is super simple stuff. Read the article.
If you don’t want your intelligence being questioned you should perhaps read the article. Then do some extremely easy math which will validate my answer of 56%.
You aren’t discussing in good faith if you won’t even read the provided source when discussing hard numbers.