Skip Navigation

You're viewing a single thread.

315 comments
  • PLACES WERE NOT SUPPOSED TO BE DRIVEN TO

    Says who? Is there some natural law when the universe was created that said mankind are not allowed to drive?

    YEARS OF BUILDING CAR INFRASTRUCTURE yet NO DECREASE IN OVERALL TRAVEL TIME

    Ok you go and set off on foot on a 200km journey, and a car sets off at the same time to get to the same place, who will get there first?

    Want to go somewhere fast? We have a vehicle for that; It's called a "TRAIN"

    Trains are great at moving people / goods between urban areas, but are awful (obviously) for point-to-point journeys. Want to the doctors fast? Can't exactly get on the the train directly outside your house to the front door of the doctors. I like trains, I use them where I can and always use them whenever I go into the office, but you cannot seriously suggest using trains to totally replace cars, it's so ridiculous that I'd swear you've never even seen one.

    "i am DRIVING my...."

    Not sure what's deranged about it? In fact that case is very valid as you're likely to have a lot of shopping (two weeks worth) that you'd really struggle to carry on public transport. It might have a bit more authenticity if you said it was just to get some bread and milk.


    I get the sentiment, we should totally be trying to reduce our car usage and planning our urban environments to favour walking, cycling and public transport, but the fuckcars community on here are totally deranged. Your arguments look ridiculous and aren't going to convince anyone.

You've viewed 315 comments.