You're viewing part of a thread.
If that interpretation makes you happy, then go on and believe that. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
What exactly is the debate here? I literally can't even tell what the argument is supposed to be lol
Lmao of course anarchist organizations have mounted self defense, and there's some lessons learned for what happens when you don't. There's also some lessons to be learned from the USSR what self-defense on a national scale looks like.
Madison needs to tell me how much they rule.
Yeah, I'm sure we disagree on a fair bit, but I think we're still both communists, I can't tell what their deal is.
You're cute, I do love a persistent idiot. You know refusing to accept your wrong just detracts from any argument you've made before.
Love it, keep on boo boo.
What argument?
Pick one.
You don't know any argument that I've made either, do you? :3
Which one.
I'm waiting for you to supply one. ^^
What a bad faith argument, we've been talking about your interpretation of an idiom that I have proved you are wrong about.
Again: Where did I claim I disagreed with the dictionary definition? Shouldn't be that hard to find if it is that obvious.
I state: I never disagreed with the definition of the idiom you googled. Prove me wrong.
Literally every time you told me I don't know what I'm talking about.
I just did, if you lack the reading comprehension to figure it out I can't honestly help you to.
Literally every time you told me I don't know what I'm talking about.
Yeah, never did that though. You're just paranoid.
Don't forget btw, that you tried to dunk on an 800 year old idiom and then tried to blame it on my (granted: not 100% accurate, since english is my second language after all) translation.