You're viewing part of a thread.
There's just a small issue. We know they have and are still using the human shields.
It might be a stupid tactic but it's not a good idea to bet against stupidity. And I don't think it's necessary that stupid. For Hamas, if the civilians give them cover then that's good and if not, it looks bad for Israel. Sorta win-win, especially since they don't really seem to care about those civilian lives.
Again.
It is utterly impossible to use "human shields" against a GENOCIDAL state for the oh-so-fucking obvious reason that said GENOCIDAL state is GENOCIDAL and wouldn't give a damn about (supposed) "human shields."
Oh no I broke the bot
Again (for the terminally white supremacist).
It is utterly impossible to use "human shields" against a GENOCIDAL state for the oh-so-fucking obvious reason that said GENOCIDAL state is GENOCIDAL and wouldn't give a damn about (supposed) "human shields."
Literal spam
Again (for the really terminally white supremacist).
It is utterly impossible to use "human shields" against a GENOCIDAL state for the oh-so-fucking obvious reason that said GENOCIDAL state is GENOCIDAL and wouldn't give a damn about (supposed) "human shields."
Unsubscribe
Again (for the really, really terminally white supremacist).
It is utterly impossible to use "human shields" against a GENOCIDAL state for the oh-so-fucking obvious reason that said GENOCIDAL state is GENOCIDAL and wouldn't give a damn about (supposed) "human shields."
Jokes aside, is everything alright with you? I'm asking because you've been spamming that same thing for a while now. I'm a bit concerned, is all.
...aaaaaaaaand again.
It is utterly impossible to use "human shields" against a GENOCIDAL state for the oh-so-fucking obvious reason that said GENOCIDAL state is GENOCIDAL and wouldn't give a damn about (supposed) "human shields."