"We recognize that, in the next four years, our decision may cause us to have an even more difficult time. But we believe that this will give us a chance to recalibrate, and the Democrats will have to consider whether they want our votes or not."
That's gotta be one of the strangest reasonings I've heard in a while.
I didn’t. I was sarcastically pointing out that we have a 0% chance of that happening under republicans.
Meanwhile if we had elected Clinton we would be looking at a very different SCOTUS and still have Roe standing.
I naively thought that out little Trump boondoggle would remind people of what can happen when they forget what kind of system we all function under but here we are, again, saying “you really don’t want to do that”.
Guess we need another round to make things even worse?
lol the fuck? It’s literally a facetious statement “maybe republicans will do it” while knowing full well that would never happen.
Nothing in that comment even slightly suggests I’m calling you a Republican.
How does one “ignore” a state?
That’s it, if Biden doesn’t come knocking on my door I’m not voting for him. Otherwise, how could I ask him questions and gather information on his policy positions? [this is another sarcastic paragraph meant to point out the fact that people shouldn’t need a visit from a candidate to make a voting decision. TV and the internet exist.]
That’s it, if Biden doesn’t come knocking on my door I’m not voting for him. Otherwise, how could I ask him questions and gather information on his policy positions?
I mean, that's what Clinton failed to do in swing states. And it's why she lost. You may think that swing states have an overinflated sense of their own importance and that talking to the flyover hayseeds is unbecoming, but ultimately, votes are earned, and can be lost. Clinton couldn't grasp that. She lost.
You can't grasp it either.
Maybe it's because understanding it means you'll have to admit that Clinton earned her loss.
I can't get over how you accused the guy of saying something he didn't and then when it had to be spelled the fuck out for you that no, he never accused you of anything, you just decided to ignore it and pretend it never happened.
I can’t get over how you accused the guy of saying something he didn’t
I found his walkback unconvincing and decided to let it go because I had other things to say and didn't want to deal with him fixating on that. Believe what you want.
He didn't walk back anything. You accused him of calling you a republican and made the dumbass decision to double down on that. He pointed out, again, that no, he never did. Anyone can read the comment thread and see that he didn't.
So in the face of looking like an absolute jackass, you chose to try and pretend it just never happened. Cowardly trying to avoid admitting that you were wrong because you either have poor reading skills or were just trying to make shit up.
The guy literally responded to criticisms of the Dems by saying Republicans also won't do it, implying that the criticism is made with the support of Republicans in mind.
He even doubled down on it by accusing the other guy of making a facetious statement that maybe Republicans will codify Roe v Wade, despite there being no evidence of it. This again implies the other guy is supporting Republicans.
Despite all this, you were too stupid to see it and accused others of acting like an absolute jackass while being the perfect example of one.