How does employing a rapist not constitute an unsafe work environment for female employees?
How does employing a rapist not constitute an unsafe work environment for female employees?
So I just discovered that I have been working next to the waste of oxygen that raped my best friend several years ago. I work in a manufacturing environment and I know that you can't fire someone just for being a sex offender unless it directly interferes with work duties (in the US). But despite it being a primarily male workforce he does work with several women who have no idea what he is. He literally followed a woman home, broke into her house, and raped her. Him working here puts every female employee at risk. How is that not an unsafe working environment? How is it at even legal to employ him anywhere where he will have contact with women?
You're viewing part of a thread.
It did not say it's not rape. Rape is a criminal term to be used in criminal court. Sexual Assault is the civil court term for rape. He was not punished, he was sued.
What college did you go to kiddo? You seem real dim.
Article clearly mentioned that there was not enough evidence to prove that he raped her, you can read it, it is free on internet. Or maybe you just don't want to read something which doesn't match your opinion or ideology
No part of that says he did not do it, which is your claim. Are you illiterate?
It is clearly mentioned, no evidence of vaginal intercourse. He was never proven guilty for rape, just SA.
That does not mean he didn't do it. You need a brush up on your 3rd grade reading comprehension.
Maybe he did it, but he is not Proven guilty for rape in court, so we don't have any right to call him rapist.
He raped her, therefore he is a rapist. What are you not getting here
But court says no
Yes we do. He raped her. He is a rapist. OJ is a killer and trump is a rapist. Escaping justice does not mean you didn't do it.
You can have your own opinion, no one is stopping you but according to the court he is not, so your opinion doesn't matter
Permanently Deleted
THIS.
All the rest of this conversation is pedantic nonsense (on both sides, I might add).
It's like if the law decided that only fire brick red as defined by this website is red : https://html-color.codes/red
And then someone on lemmy said "the court said your car isn't red". And then we'd have to spend a half hour and an incredibly long post to explain how courts sometimes use different definitions for words that people use in normal conversation, and to be careful how you interpret that.
Bottom line is Trump did what everyone else is calling rape.
That is false. Again. You keep saying the same thing and you keep being wrong. Not proving he's a rapist does not means he not one. Please go back you school you complete dunce.
According to court he is not
False. Again. Being unable to prove something true does not make that thing false. The ONLY reason it can't be proven true is because of how long ago he did it.
The Court was required to use softer language because the violent sex crime he committed and is unapologetic about was committed in the 90s.
There's a statue of limitations that prevents him from being criminally charged. But as part of a defamation case a jury found that there was sufficient evidence to determine that Trump knowingly and intentionally lied when he said he didn't rape her.
Which is to say - a jury unanimously ruled that he committed the act that would be would otherwise be called rape, but because of a legal technicality can't be. Not everyone on that Jury was a liberal, woke Democrat. There were Republicans that heard testimony and saw evidence and determined that he forced a woman to have sex against her will.
He did it. The he got successfully sued again for lying about it more and lashing out against his victim.
In every way that matters when evaluating someone's character, he's an unrepentant, vengeful rapist.