Biden performs better against Trump than Harris, Newsom: Poll
Biden performs better against Trump than Harris, Newsom: Poll
President Biden performs best among several high-profile Democrats in hypothetical general election match-ups against former President Trump, according to a new poll. The Emerson College survey re…
You're viewing part of a thread.
Probably no worse than "Democrat". Anyways, you said it yourself, they even call Biden a socialist. Exactly how far right to you think a Democrat has to go to get those votes? Anyways, Bernie knows how to reach red state Republican voters. https://apnews.com/article/joe-biden-health-election-2020-184f4519c756479c3bf082108e7ea17e
Wow, your comment is a mess.
Have a nice night.
Hopefully you’ll understand what I’m saying in the morning.
I think maybe you might be the one who gets it in the morning. You've internalized the framing sold to you by establishment media and can't seem to see past it. You have no understanding of how a socialist can do better than a centrist in red states, so you reject what polling tells us is true.
Most of the ire directed at "socialists" comes from the association of Socialists and Democrats with elitism. Actual Socialists are not elitist and can speak to the actual needs of voters in a way that centrists do not.
I keep hearing this, and I still don't get it. So red state voters have only two modes: socialist or libertarian-capitalist?
If what they "really" want is socialism, then why don't they vote for center-left candidates when they have the chance? Nobody's going to believe you want $100 if you keep sending death threats to the one person offering you $50.
Maybe people are more complicated than something that can be measured across a single dimension?
Socialist concepts actually sell a whole lot better in red states than blue, even as the word itself doesn't. Farmers co-ops are extremely common. VFW halls in rural areas are often busy social centers. Poorer areas like those around abandoned coal mines are totally dependent on federal aid. Such areas care a hell of a lot more about issues than labels.
Take a look on YouTube for some old videos of Bernie doing town halls in the deep south. That will tell you a lot more than I could.
Shrug. I think they need to figure out how to better align their voting habits with their policy goals, instead of expecting everyone else to carefully shape their language around whatever neuroses they have that causes them to vote GOP.
As long as the focus is on blaming voters instead of figuring out how to reach voters, all you are doing is virtue signaling. Blaming voters is a defeatist mentality.
The issue is also not about people voting GOP. Democrats who chase GOP voters lose in almost every case, with rare exception for oddballs like Manchin. Winning elections is all about turnout for Democrats. When there is high turnout, Democrats win, which is why Republicans focus their efforts on suppressing turnout.
People who don't think either side is working in their best interest and addressing their problems don't show up to vote. They don't even show up in conversations on lemmy. They have decided that politics is just a scam they want nothing to do with. That is a direct result of rampant legalized corruption in the Democratic party, and no amount of fear mongering about Trump or Republicans is going to change that.
I'm not telling you that you are wrong, I'm telling you that being right doesn't win elections. Convincing potential voters that you are in their corner does, and that takes a long time to happen once trust is broken.
Bernie couldn’t even win the primary, how was he supposed to win presidency?
There was a reason Trump was pushing to run against Bernie in 2020.
What was the reason that most voters gave in exit polls for voting for Biden instead of Bernie? Do you know? It was about perceived electability. Bernie and Biden polled nearly identically against Trump, but the media constantly harped on the same false claims you are making here. Beating Trump was Democratic voter's top priority, and the media relentlessly claimed that Biden was the "safe" candidate, with zero evidence to base it on except for opinions within the establishment bubble. (The same bubble that thought Hillary was a shoe-in.) That is not something that would have been a factor in the general election at all. When voters were asked who's policies they preferred, Bernie was the clear favorite.
Trump and his campaign were constantly sending mixed messages about whom he would rather face. There is no clear indication of what they really thought. More than anything, Trump wanted division among Democrats. As always, the Republican strategy was to suppress the vote.
https://theintercept.com/2020/01/29/trump-sanders-2020-election/
I was taking about how Clinton beat Bernie in the primaries, I forgot that Biden beat him too.
Thanks for the reminder.
Yes they did. Sure worked out well when Clinton won the primary. Now we get to see the consequences of choosing Biden/Harris. I really hope Trump is disqualified, cause it's looking like it will be a worse trounce than 2016.
You seem to be missing 2020 in your analysis.
I did speak to 2020 and the myth of Biden's special electability status. You, on the other hand, seem to be missing analysis in your analysis. All you have done is make bald assertions and snide digs, while I have offered explanations and at least some minimal evidence.
If there are specifics you want further support on, I am happy to do the legwork, but that doesn't seem to be something you are interested in. The polling isn't that hard to find, but I don't see any reason to bother.