We’re not past that. He could step down, the convention could choose someone else. You personally could just say “actually, I’m a human being with a heart that pumps blood that bleeds and I will not support this piece of trash” along with me.
It is never too late to stand up against genocide and the fascist police state.
The democrats already lost those voters anyway. Anyone who thinks Biden is a piece of shit but doesn’t want trump will just stay home. If anything you ought to hope that the democrats realize that Biden doesn’t have a path to victory and they run someone else. Then there’s a chance of getting all those people who voted him in during 2020 back onboard.
The third clinton campaign ought to have made it clear to you that you can’t scold people to the polls, don’t repeat the mistakes of the past.
Making a great case for the democrats. Their guy can literally be complicit in genocide and speaking out against free speech and the right to protest and they still won’t change course no matter how many raise their voices against them. Party of the people.
Let’s dive into how trying to get people to vote PSL is pushing worse over bad though. We agree that PSL ballots don’t get counted for trump and you’d have to be a paleo conservative to think the democrats have a better platform. How exactly is encouraging people to vote for the objectively better party and candidate pushing for worse?
Do you think it’s all about winning? Even on the off chance that PSL doesn’t sweep every state harder than Regan, significant support for a third party opens the doors for massive funding and institutional advantages.
And it shows the other parties that there’s a support base for that platform, leading them to change theirs.
Do you really think trump will be worse than Biden on free speech, protest and the gaza genocide?
What’s the line where you say “actually it’s better to push for an alternative than to try and pick 99.99% Hitler over the genuine article”?
And if you really think it’s about the terrain, why don’t you take an accelerationist view and push for the terrain that heightens the contradictions soonest?