Borrowing the idea of ‘bug bounties’ from the technology industry could provide a systematic way to detect and correct the errors that litter the scientific literature.
Borrowing the idea of ‘bug bounties’ from the technology industry could provide a systematic way to detect and correct the errors that litter the scientific literature.
My understanding is that it was submitted, reviewed and published then revoked when the absurdness was noticed. This isn't the first thing I've heard about terrible articles being published generated by ai. I wish I could remember the other one. It was recent too.