You make it clear they’re not welcome in the community, by force if necessary, and you let them back in once they’ve shown they can be trusted to be a member of the community again. IF they show they’ve changed.
I’ve been on a committee of people making this decision more than once. Rarely do people change enough to be welcomed back. Community self policing is the only way to really protect yourself when the government shows they wont.
Where do they go? Do you propose that America has red states where only conservatives should live & blue states where liberals can live? Do you want to put over half of voters in concentration camps?
This you?
Regarding your lack of awareness:
Oh no, the slipperiest of slopes attached to nothing but pure conjecture! I will never be hungry again with all of the words you just put into my mouth!
You don't think this was an attempt to raise awareness of your deliberate misinterpretation?
Their point was that kicking someone out of a small club isn’t the same as kicking them out of the state.
Your exaggeration of their point is what made it bad, not the point itself. That’s what the slippery slope fallacy is.
You're still unaware that you misinterpreted them online?!
I didn't misinterpret them. Is it not true that over 40% of voters support Trump and that they are accusing Trump supporters of being fascist. Where do you expect those people to go if you think you'll just kick them out of the communities where they live?
You did misinterpret them. What kind of a community has a meeting to exclude folks for anti LGBT views? I tell you this, it wasn't a housing project or a city, certainly not a state, it was surely a support group or similar. Your reading comprehension cannot be this bad.
You're being disingenuous and inventing narratives. Why don't you go ahead and post permalinks to where you claim I misinterpreted them. They weren't taking about a small club. They were talking about kicking Trump supporters out of their communities.