When the Eagles hired him, I knew this would happen. We can’t keep an OC and he was obviously on a Head Coach trajectory. Idk what sports news sounds like outside of Philly, but the Saints deal has sounded like a done deal for over a week here
Part of me is like “fuck yeah” but there’s another part of me that thinks if he missed the game, he’d be more likely to come back next year
Edit: ESPN actually said it really well:
He indicated before the season that he would retire following the 2024 campaign. But he was having a major impact (3.5 sacks, 7 QB hits in 11 games) before he got hurt and has since left the door open for a return for a 16th NFL season.
Then again, a win Sunday would provide a perfect storybook ending.
lol, you don’t go right from law school to a SCOTUS clerk. You need a lot more experience. Most have clerked for prestigious judges or held multiple respected clerk positions before they get to SCOTUS
80
Reply
!antisexism@lemmy.today - a joint movement of men, women and nonbinary people against all sorts of gender-based discrimination
how desperate are you to have him read your message? If you sign up for Truth Social and spend your entire day hitting “refresh,” I bet he’d read it if you can be the first reply to one of his posts
It is though. Like I said, certain tasks are important, but others are overreach (specifically what they do with censorship and control of certain airwaves)
I get it, it’s too late to go back to an era where radio waves were free, but the FCC has way too stringent rules. They should worry about things like protecting critical devices from interference and ensuring companies don’t fuck people over (monopolies, robocalls, stuff like that)
1022
Reply
!antisexism@lemmy.today - a joint movement of men, women and nonbinary people against all sorts of gender-based discrimination
I’m going to go against the grain here. I abandoned it after about an hour or two, then forced myself to try it again. It took a couple hours to pick up, but I ended up loving it
70
Reply
!antisexism@lemmy.today - a joint movement of men, women and nonbinary people against all sorts of gender-based discrimination
Not true at all. That’s just not how trademark protection work.
A movie trademark might not get protected from, say, a food. Those are not related. Trademark protection can apply across media though, especially when it’s something similar like movies and video games (again, contrast that to movies and food)