The case for, and against, Kamala Harris
The case for, and against, Kamala Harris
Let's be honest: she'd probably be an underdog. But she's still a better option than Biden.
You're viewing a single thread.
Why go for a slightly less damaged but still weak candidate when we actually have good ones.
4 2 ReplyBecause you can't run candidates who don't want to.
7 1 ReplyIf Biden actually stepped aside you would be astounded how many Dems put themselves forward as replacements.
Right now everyone is being coy for party unity - but if you thought Whitmer was on Colbert just to promote a book you're naive.
3 3 ReplyI love Whitmer. She's my Governor, and I think she'd be an amazing President. But I really don't think folks in Pennsylvania or Georgia know who she is. Maybe with enough appearances that could change, but we're getting down to the wire.
5 2 ReplyThere are FOUR MONTHS LEFT, this is in no fucking way "down to the wire."
4 4 ReplyDon't deal with bureaucracy a lot, do you?
4 3 Reply
If the top tier candidates Harris is polling the best. Which is surprising to me, but it's hard to dismiss the data.
1 0 ReplyThey've run extremely selective polls and Hillary Clinton outperformed Harris.
1 0 ReplyI'm sure that now that she's the front runner (and presumptive nominee) we'll get some better polling coming out soon.
1 0 ReplyI hope so! I just want the best candidate to beat Trump.
1 0 Reply