Bethesda says most of Starfield's 1000+ planets are dull on purpose because 'when the astronauts went to the moon, there was nothing there' but 'they certainly weren't bored'
Bethesda says most of Starfield's 1000+ planets are dull on purpose because 'when the astronauts went to the moon, there was nothing there' but 'they certainly weren't bored'
Exploring is supposed to be a reward in itself.
Sure Todd, lol
You're viewing a single thread.
How is this any different than No Man's Sky?
Wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy fewer planets.
I think they meant in terms of disappointment
Hello Games put a lot of effort into giving NMS a plethora of free updates over the course of years to make good on their promises.
We all know damn well Bethesda isn't gonna do shit except a couple of over-priced half-baked DLCs.
HG just kept duct taping more crap to the game without adding any depth or integrating their crap together. It's still an incredibly shallow game where you've seen all that there's worth seeing on the first day of playing.
Here are the patch notes via wiki. They went hard.
That just isn't true.