xkcd #2832: Urban Planning Opinion Progression
xkcd #2832: Urban Planning Opinion Progression
Alt text:
If they're going to make people ride bikes and scooters in traffic, then it should at LEAST be legal to do the Snow Crash thing where you use a hook-shot-style harpoon to catch free rides from cars.
You're viewing a single thread.
The Netherlands is flat. Lots of US cities are not bike friendly due to hills.
Good news! There’s a new technology called an ‘e-bike’, which makes this problem (and wind, and sweat, and physical condition) completely irrelevant.
Physical condition is still relevant. If nothing else, being lighter extends your battery range. I have a couple of E-bikes. My 230lb/104.3kg ass can only manage to extend the range of the bikes to about 30 miles per charge, without pedaling. My friend's daughter who is more like 105lbs/47.6kg, gets almost 50 miles per charge, without pedaling.
St. Petesburg is flat, but it doesn't have a lot of bikes. Moscow is hilly(and called city on 7 hills) and has more bikes. Sooooo, extrapolating US should be better for bikes than Netherlands.
So why isn't anyone cycling in flat cities? And are improvements only allowed if they fix All The Things?
Changing urbanism culture doesn't mean that everywhere needs to be exactly like the Netherlands, if a place is too hilly there are still better solutions than car-centrism.