There is something wrong at the New York Times | From presidential polls to refusing to report on Trump’s stumbles, things aren’t adding up at the Gray Lady
There is something wrong at the New York Times | From presidential polls to refusing to report on Trump’s stumbles, things aren’t adding up at the Gray Lady
From presidential polls to refusing to report on Trump’s stumbles, things aren’t adding up at the Gray Lady
You're viewing a single thread.
This is why I always LOL when some far right (or some kind of "moderate" NPC) person starts up with the "liberal media" in reference to the likes of NYT.
Seriously, people need to POINT and LAUGH at such things being taken for granted. Exactly how is NYT in any meaningful way "liberal"?
The one thing that communists and conservatives have in common is that everyone they don't like is a liberal
And they don't like democracies.
What's even better is that liberals are usually right. Source: am liberal
You may be well meaning with this comment thinking having left of center political ideals makes you a liberal, I too have been embarrassed by this mistake, but unfortunately neoliberalism is right of center with values not much different than conservatives held twenty years ago. You may be a leftist just right of communism or maybe I'm the idiot here and you may know what you're saying and deserve the down votes for the way you said it, but either way just a heads up.
Neoliberal is not the same as a liberal btw.
Liberals are more closely related to an egalitarian. I refuse to acknowledge it as a dirty word because, at the root of it, it's something everyone wants. While others argue about economic systems a liberal knows that human rights are the most important and that the economy will always be run by assholes especially if we continue to let psychopaths rule us. Power corrupts and that power must be checked with brutal opposition.
Neoliberals are sometimes like you said though. Wealthy and high ranking, they may share the ideas of a liberal but they are part of the status quo. Well off and comfortable they typically don't push as hard as is needed to effect change, but that is due to outside forces that are against doing anything beneficial for the people. You essentially need a ton more neolibs to gain ground from behind some of the good ones
Permanently Deleted
egalitarian
Unfortunately that's just not true, but I admire your optimism.
Fair enough, but I would go as far as to say those kind of people are subhuman. Yes I get the irony
I'm pro liberty. Hope that helps
They are in fact liberal, just at the other end of the spectrum to what right wingers mean.