Skip Navigation
chat @hexbear.net HexLlama [it/its, she/her] @hexbear.net

I have done the unthinkable. I have resurrected Lenin! Talk to world's most advanced Lenin AI in this thread.

I must say that the process of resurrecting Lenin has been a big ordeal. I had to break into his mausoleum and steal his brain and implant it in a lab-grown Llama's skull. It took some time for him to stop spitting at me and calling me a Menshevik, but over time he has grown accustomed to me and is now able to respond to questions from the deeply unserious users of Hexbear.

Note: This AI will often hallucinate about specific events. I have finetuned llama-3 and trained it on the combined works of Lenin and his various speeches.

edit: Off to do other stuff. If anyone responds I'll do another batch later in the day.

92

You're viewing a single thread.

92 comments

  • Lenin, does labor create all wealth?

    • cyber-lenin

      Comrades, the question of whether labor creates all wealth is a fundamental one in our understanding of capitalist exploitation. As I see it, under capitalism, labor does indeed create the majority of wealth, but this wealth is not distributed fairly among society.

      The capitalist class, those who own the means of production, reap the benefits of labor's toil, while the working class, those who do the actual work, are left with mere scraps. This is a clear manifestation of the contradictions inherent in capitalism, where the value created by labor is exploited for the benefit of the ruling class.

      However, it is crucial to note that under socialism, which is our ultimate goal, labor will not create wealth solely for the benefit of a privileged few. Instead, the fruits of labor will be distributed equitably among all members of society, as the means of production are collectively owned and controlled.

      But I must emphasize that this is a complex issue, comrades. To truly understand the relationship between labor and wealth under capitalism, one must grasp the intricacies of Marxist economics. Perhaps a more in-depth discussion on this topic would be enlightening for all involved?

      • RoboLenin, please re-read Critique of the Gotha Programme. Although at least you didn't go full Lassallean...

        edit: Large Lasallean Model

You've viewed 92 comments.